The first few demo images are merely creepy but get increasingly NSFW as you scroll down.
The semi-wholesome text intro provided by the OP and the inclusion of other random images (a woman and some pigs in the collapsed building aftermath of an earthquake appears more than once) makes me assume (hope?) that, despite the creepy URL, it might just be another generative AI mishap.
Due to the nature of the models, some are prone to generating NSFW (Not Safe For Work) type images.
I will think about how to best control this issue moving forward. I apologize again for any inconvenience this may have caused. At the same time, I appreciate your feedback, support, and understanding.
Or put an age-verifier in front of the site
User-generated images will, by default, not be made public or won't be displayed on the homepage. They will only be made public after meeting certain criteria, and of course, this will primarily depend on whether the user wants them to be public.
Thank you for your feedback and for your understanding and support!
Tomorrow, I will move user-generated images to a dedicated page, which will require clicking through to view.
The homepage of the website will no longer display images generated by other users. This should somewhat resolve the issue of not being able to load the site in public places.
You can view a slideshow of the gems here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTW2BzdsiOU
[NSFW] warning. Don't show it to your kids, but as an adult that can wrap their head around the idea of a greedy filthy female version of Gorden Gecko, you should be able to handle it. It's just art.
EDIT: I saw the highly sexualized images someone else was making, so yeah, there really is no safety rails on the generative possibilities that I noticed.