sadly, w&B means you have to upload it to the cloud, which is not possible in every case :(
Reliance on cloud services is a legitimate worry though for privacy, IP, process control, reliability, etc.
The comparison between Optuna and WandB was not apples to apples. Optuna is completely self-hosted and local. It also focuses on hyperopt narrowly with flexible design unlike WandB that now assumes to be capture a large part of cloud-based MLOPS workflow.
It would be more fair to compare Optuna to Hyperopt. And I think Optuna was the better choice there, but I did simple PoCing and have no strong opinions.