Nuclear battery produces power for 50 years without needing to charge
independent.co.uk
independent.co.uk
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38966352 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38978085 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38970438 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38980963 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38943144 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38951104
maybe they are a scheme to deceive potential investors.
That's only 20 years, vs. the 50 from this article.
What isotope(s) are they using for 50 years? All I see is "After the decay period, the 63 isotopes turn into a stable isotope of copper", which sounds very odd. Why 63 different isotopes? What decay chain ends up with copper?
Article about Russian research into a ⁶³Ni battery at https://phys.org/news/2018-06-prototype-nuclear-battery-powe... with a link to the scientific publication at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S09259... .
Is the battery a primary cell? Or it is a secondary cell?
One is a producer of energy and usually can't be recharged.
The other is merely a storage for energy and needs to be charged and recharged to be useful.