Pirated copies do not get erased due to the whims of the copyright owner.
Pirated copies do not get erased due to the whims of the copyright owner.
* Getting back content they've purchased that was removed by the vendor, or where their account with the vendor was closed without giving the customer a way to retrieve the things they've bought.
* content was not able to be purchased.
I haven't heard "beats paying" from anyone, almost everyone likes subscription music, Prime Video, Netflix and so on. Where the issues are is purchases, where people thought they bought something only to find out that they had a license that expires.
Example: I signed up for crunchyroll after I learned a show I wanted to watch was there.
Then after I paid, found out that on my country, it is not available.
Or when I bought a ton of books in fictionwise, then Barnes e noble bought them and restricted downloads only to people from USA. Funnily I only bought from that site because was the only site that sold to my country.
EDIT: Fixed typo "grow up".
Pirating music isn’t worth my time with Spotify Premium.
>the only thing I pirate is the occasional movie I want to watch that isn’t on Hulu, Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max or Amazon Prime Video.
You maintain 5 subscriptions and still have to pirate every now and again? I just watch whatever I want on plex+radarr/sonarr. That sounds exhausting.
I don't think I'll want to follow in your footsteps. Maybe I'll take out subscriptions for the things I really like, but I'm probably going to keep using pirated content for my actual consumption - its just a better experience at this point.
You can of course just “download everything” with sonarr and radarr, but then you’re maintaining a server at home with X hard drives to store all the content.
But yeah don’t pay for subscription services if you don’t want to.
Ive head
- beats paying, or too expensive - because I can lol - because fuck [insert company here] - because Plex is more convenient - because I want to apply an english subtitle/patch to it - because mods
none of my friends were banned from PSN/Netflix/Amazon/etc. It's just cheaper or more convinient for them.
granted, these were mostly for games, and there has yet to be a "Netflix for games" as of now.
I’ll pay for digital music on iTunes, which is DRM free, but won’t buy movies there, as the DRM means it’s only good as long as Apple decides to keep it going. As we move from people maintaining media libraries to streaming, it seems like it’s only a matter of time before those digital copies become worthless.
I think there's another component though. The megacorps that provide streaming video are so far removed from the actual creators, it almost feels like the right thing to do is to avoid lining their pockets with more profit. This is a stark contrast to music, where you have small groups of people you actively want to support.
Given the friction to paying for the music you want is so low and the relationship is more "personal" it just has a different feel.
I have ample money and subscribe to netflix, amazon prime and something else I forgot (I hardly watch tv).
I never pirate music anymore - Spotify is perfect. I have a family subscription.
I subscribe to Youtube because I like the content free from ads.
Netflix is getting worse and worse so someday I will stop the subscription and get the content via BitTorrent
The exception for me is old stuff. I have exactly zero qualms about not paying for a forty year old movie. Half the actors are dead anyway. The film studio doesn't need or deserve my money for something nobody alive had anything to do with.
I do blanket pirate music, though. There doesn't seem to be a way for me to buy music without 99.999% of the money going to a label or a studio. Apart from bandcamp and other indie stores, but those typically aren't my jam in the first place. If I could support artists directly, I would. But I can't, and I refuse to support predatory labels, so I don't. I do feel a little bad about it, but options are limited.
Oh, and I will gleefully pirate textbooks, of course. Also research papers and most nonfiction in general. Audiobooks and fiction are a hard no unless unavailable or older than I am. Everyone should pirate textbooks always, it's only just.
So yeah, mostly for ideological reasons and the incomparable convenience.
I've had artists send me mp3 in the morning after I gave them cash at a concert the night before. :-)
I also don't have to worry about my favorite shows disappearing from the service on a whim. The files on my server will always be available to me.
In one country show X is available on service Y - in another it’s available on service Z, in another it’s not available at all.
However, they are always available on Torrentleech and The Pirate Bay.
I stopped pirating music when Spotify came to the US. It’s proof that people will pay for things if A) the price is reasonable and B) consumption is convenient. Why? Pirating content is inconvenient. Popcorn Time was as close as it got to “convenient” but that was quickly shut down/abandoned.
yup, and the cost there is instead put on the artist. Who don't make any reasonable money but need to do it "for exposure".
I'm not surprised movies and games didn't follow. game devs and actors don't get paid tiny residuals, but instead are paid upfront.
When I was young, I pirated because I was broke.
When I got a job and grew older, I would continue to pirate, because it was annoying to shuffle through a DVD collection or for the game the disk to put into the drive bay for a game that was already installed on the computer's hard disk. I regularly downloaded no-cd cracks for games I had legally bought, and if I'm going to be fucking around with shady executables from disreputable corners of the internet anyway, I might as well save myself a car trip to the mall.
When Netflix streaming became ubiquitous and Steam became good, I stopped pirating, because it was more convenient to do media legally than it was to pirate them.
Now that Netflix has been Balkanized into a dozen competing services, all of which are shitty, I pirate TV/movies again, because it is more convenient to always know what site to go to to acquire media. I subscribe to Amazon prime for the free shipping, but even for media which is available on Amazon Prime, I still pirate it because -- wait for it -- the DRM doesn't work.
I still buy games on Steam because it's easy and convenient. If Ubisoft and EA get their way and cut into Steam's market share and make it so there are too few games available to play on Steam, or games that I've already paid for start becoming un-bought from my library, or Steam starts becoming unusable due to onerous DRM, I'll start pirating again.
Music is more complicated. In the '90s I ripped all my CDs into MP3s, and burned them onto data CDs which I put into a big ass CD changer in the trunk of my car. Later on, I could fit all of them on a DVD in the head unit. Later on, I could put them all on a USB thumb stick which I plugged into the console. As time went on, I realized I wasn't engaging with my music in any meaningful way. I'd turn it on and hit random and literally never think about what I was listening to. So I've picked up vinyl specifically because it's less convenient. I have to actually think about what music I want to listen to, and then actively make a decision.
So do I pirate movies and TV because I like free stuff? Not really. I probably spent in the ballpark of $50 on games a month, maybe $200 on music per month. I have the money to pay for video media. But the last thing I watched was the Legend of Vox Machina, which is produced by Amazon Studios specifically for Amazon Prime Video, which I already pay for, and I pirated it anyway because it's more convenient.
So do I pirate movies and TV for ideological reasons? Not really. I mean, don't get me wrong, Hollywood is kinda gross, but so is the video games industry and the music industry.
Sorry for rambling. I guess my point is that it's incorrect to set this up as a dichotomy between getting free shit and sticking it to the man. For me at least, it's neither of those things.
Simple as.
Sure, they make an example of some poor guy every now and then and they cross their fingers hoping that this scary PR turns people away from piracy, yeah. Which is wishful thinking and they know it.
99.9999% of everyone pirating though? They are never going to be persecuted.
Turns out, if you ask people to pay and can't even withhold a fair bargain from your side -- as in, don't delete stuff from people's libraries -- they stop caring about the legality of it all. Especially with the extra context that this legality is a table that's severely tilted in the favor of the vendors and is not consumer-friendly.
The truth that the copyright holders don't like is this: people, even very technically illiterate people, are not as stupid so as to pay ownership but get rented goods license in return. It ain't happening. They coasted on the public's indifference for a long time but it's visible that the public's perception is changing.
that 1 in a million tends to be the one person serving the million, though. That's why they don't waste time chasing the customers like the war on drugs. Go right after the dealer and throw the book at them.
>Turns out, if you ask people to pay and can't even withhold a fair bargain from your side -- as in, don't delete stuff from people's libraries -- they stop caring about the legality of it all.
Good thing most people still pay in that case. The other part of that metaphor is that 999,999 people may pirate, but 5m or so are still making that product profitable. anti-piracy isnt just about making pirates relent, but to shut down future pirates in later products.
>They coasted on the public's indifference for a long time but it's visible that the public's perception is changing.
could have fooled me. If we're being realistic, I doubt this will affect more than 10k people. How many people really used a play station store to buy a digital movie? And remember that PS shut down their movies side 2.5 years ago.
Could have fooled me x2 -- we both can pull numbers out of our bottoms. ;)
The part you seem to be downplaying is this: there are things that can't be directly measured. Public resentment is one of them. It's one of those variables that grows and grows until at one point an eruption happens. Include that in your analysis, history has proven that this factor does exist.
> Good thing most people still pay in that case. The other part of that metaphor is that 999,999 people may pirate, but 5m or so are still making that product profitable. anti-piracy isnt just about making pirates relent, but to shut down future pirates in later products.
Obviously, yes. It's a scaremongering tactic. I'll admit they are succeeding, one after another trackers fall down with a tempo that the pirate community does not seem to be able to sustain; they bring some other trackers back up and that seems to be enough for them for now, if I read TorrentFreak's articles well that is.
So back to the original topic: what stands in court is only a short-term factor. Again, looking at the pirate scene and the steadily declining revenue from streaming and the slow and steady grow of piracy (again), I'd say part of the people had enough. Start persecuting more aggressively and things might escalate in unpredictable ways.
How will this unfold? Beats me, and you, but I am interested in following the battle.
https://www.technologylawdispatch.com/2011/05/privacy-data-p...
I don’t have much sympathy for people who see these headlines and use it as a blanket justification to pirate anything and everything.
It's perfectly rational to me to decide to avoid getting burned in the first place, and actually a bit less rational to knowingly allow it, then wait for it to happen, and only then do something about it.
I especially don't sympathize for those who feel they need to profess loud and proud and act like Robin Hood for pirating. No you're not. Limousine liberalism at its finest. Acting like their actions are going to topple the empire instead of being seen as an ant grabbing some tiny crumb off the kitchen floor.
You can't even claim some technical boasting. You downloaded a file off the internet based on the work someone else did to upload said file, on a website that did the work of hosting. La dee da. It's not the 90's anymore; I'm not going to praise someone for doing a basic internet function in 2023.
i really don't try to justify my piracy much anymore. i like free shit and it's easy. but things like this really make it hard to feel guilty.
edit: there be pirates in these waters!
edit: please include the third and fourth sentence in your comprehension of the above, before responding.
Racing games have this issue too if they use real car brands. You can't buy the previous Forza games or some old Codemasters racing games anymore because of expired licensing.
At least on Steam they're still available for download if you previously purchased them. No clue what the experience is in console or other PC stores.
You didn't pay $10 for perpetual ownership of IASIP. You paid $10 for a month of access to Netflix or whatever service hosted that show. I still buy physical media or digital downloads of any work I want to keep for more than a month because I value it for those cases.
But you'd never show up to a Hollywood Video looking to rent Terminator 2 and get told that it's a Blockbuster exclusive rental. There were Blockbuster exclusive movies, but they all sucked so it didn't matter.
Netflix Streaming gave bigger selection and instant access. You could get 15 minutes into a movie, realize it sucks, and you didn't have to drive back to the video store for a different one.
Nowadays the selection on any streaming service feels like 1/3 of what a VHS rental place would have. Sure there's more actual quantity, but it's like the $1 rental bin. Currently, if you pick X popular movie and Y streaming service, odds are you cannot watch it on that streaming service.
I mean, it sounds like they simply learned their lesson. Or got more budget to publish such stuff. Same tactics but now more effective after giving what the audience actually wants.
Its certainly an interesting phenomenon. Hosting brick and mortar is crazy expensive so it makes sense to delegate that. Hosting servers is cheaper and way more scalable (mostly dealing with country laws instead of every single nuldijg regulation code), so it's no surprise studios want to self-distribute now that the barrier lowered.
But this is all just to say that while I pirate loads, I do have a bit of a conscious about it. That said, stories like this are why I don't lose much sleep over it.
For me, this is a rental.
In the case of PSN, official policy is that defective games are refundable. They just make it impossible to reach anyone about this during the refund window. In the case of Steam, official policy is that devs are free to push malware to your device.
But i feel "punish" is the wrong lens to look at this. It's hard for the individual to punish a corporation. Ultimately the goal is to maximize your own purchase so the best way to achieve that is to find a better product. Then that merchant grows based on their ability to serve the customer. In my experience, most companies tend to be punished not by people or competition, but by their own folly.
And if there really is no merchant serving your product for your price, that's a much larger discussion to have.
That's a lot of games, including several notable big name titles: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Games_for_Windows_%E...
That includes GTA IV, Street Fighter IV, and Resident Evil 5.
Sure but it's very much a minority point of view.
Multiplayer on the other hand...
Only because Capcom had to put in extra dev work to make it work again after the GFWL shutdown: https://www.reddit.com/r/pcgaming/comments/qq3sq9/capcom_has...
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=11481...
cough kindle... cough
And to be clear, I wouldn't be surprised if it has happened again since, but I've never heard of any, so I agree with the GP comment's assertion that it isn't common.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18am...
I don't care if people "steal" from billion dollar corporations. But let's not mince words and pretend it's some Robin Hood act of altruism. The companies already took that piracy into account on their budget book anyway; they won't change their ways over this.
That whole Gabe Newell quote about "piracy is a service issue" goes both ways. Piracy isn't always convinent and plenty of people don't wanna set up plex servers and search torrents and organize their library to get "the best experience". They just want to turn on device and play/watch/read seemlessly
And it's not my point at all in that comment. I'm just saying most 'thieves' aren't trying to prove they are good people by stealing like how piracy arguments oh so often go here. Nor trying to pretend they are archivist saving artifacts from disappearing off the face of the earth. They are either greedy, desperate to survive, and in a few rare cases a pathological disorder.
It's premium entertainment, and people either want to consume a product but dont/can't pay. It's that simple. and I'm not saying that from a judgmental POV either. I've done it quite a bit as a grade schooler.
For me, I try to find drm free copies of games when possible, or physical media when that fails. That's enough for me to feel "ownership".
----
I simply wanted to talk about the internet attitude towards piracy in this thread. I've done it but I never boasted around about slaying some corrupt corporation by ripping an ISO off a disc, or simply finding a torrent.
No, I did it to either not pay for a game or to mod games with no native mod support. I'm not a good person to begin with and I don't pretend I'm a good person by pirating.
I don't think "refund" is the best use of word here. That's usually a customer returning a product. And a company with bad refund policies tends to have bad customer service.
I've never experienced a car crash, so they can't be common, why should I wear a seatbelt?
Unless it happens a lot but doesn't get any publicity, which seems pretty unlikely as there are too many widely read forums where people it happened to would report it, and too many publications like Ars, Tech Dirt, The Register, Torrent Freak, and many others that would jump on any such story, we must indeed conclude that it is not common.
The important question is not if it is common but rather will it become common?
Discovery is part of Warner, which is currently being run by someone who will kill content for the tax write offs. He killed "Final Space" for a tax write off, cancelling future season and pulling existing seasons from streaming and sale. And last year they killed a movie, "Acme vs. Coyote", that they had completed and scheduled for release because they decided they'd rather write it off.
Because of that right now I would not buy any streaming content from Warner. In the specific case of Discovery it looks like they are just pulling it from other platforms so that it can be exclusive to services they own, like Max and Discovery+.
That probably means it is safe for now to buy Warner owned content through Warner owned platforms, but I'd worry that in the future they will decide to write it off and it will leave their own platforms too.
I can only recall it happening once before on steam, and it was due to malware on the now delisted game.
I've never experienced that in the last 20 years of purchasing digital media. You can't claim it's common.
[1] https://www.thegamer.com/failed-game-studios-best-games-meta...
[2] https://movieweb.com/famous-defunct-american-film-studios/#b...