GPT-4 is generally not competitive with domain specialists (outside areas where machines have already been competitive for some time). That of course doesn't mean it isn't valuable - but it becomes more for human augmentation than replacement.
GPT-4 is a lot better than me at unfamiliar tasks, because it has the advantage of being able to readily transform all data on the internet.
Once I have trained myself, I generally can beat GPT-4.
There is value to replacing a percentage of human labor with machine labor.
Jordan Peterson said there are no jobs in the USA for people with IQs below 87: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN3w_F9r-aI&t=338s
Mr. Peterson says lower IQ people are do better at more repetitive jobs.
Machines and AI can do more repetitive jobs. Technology took those jobs.
As AI advances, the lowest useful IQ will move up. I wonder where it will be in 10 years.
>> Note that the goal of ASI isn't to beat you per se, but the best humans.
I'm pretty sure they understand that.