No amount of Blockchain "Webinars" would have convinced my kids to use the blockchain.
No amount of Blockchain "Webinars" would have convinced my kids to use the blockchain.
I disagree. Kids will turn anything not too abstract into toys. An improvised radioactive sample (actually some neon indicator bulbs in a box) + Geiger counter brought by my parents = a version of a hide-and-seek game from my own past.
Also, a model maglev train is something so obvious that I am sure such toys will appear immediately once the technology becomes viable.
- My mom cant figure out Blockchain either
- My sister (doctor) and brother (3 degrees) cant figure out Blockchain either, because they are too afraid of scanning the wrong QR code and having their balance drained
My mom, sister, and brother all use ChatGPT. My brother uses it actively for work.
In any case, defining public use or accessibility as the metric of relevance of something is quite illogical. You end up with countless absurdities like relativity being worthless and CocaCola being the most relevant invention ever.
Which 'blockchain'? Blockchain is a singular noun, that's like saying "they can't figure out phone".
I think this is an important detail. A lot of "forced into it" numbers will get presented as "happy users" in various unfair metrics comparisons.
Can you define what a metaverse is in this case and how is it different from what we used to call an MMORPG?
Roblox involves no block chain and no VR, so what exactly is "metaverse-y" about it?
I’d wager the biggest non-speculative use case is pig butchering scams and ransomware.
Probably, but drugs are also a big use-case (and I don't just mean retail, its used in wholesale for transferring sums of money internationally to buy precursors, for example)