The whole lesson everyone learned over the last day was about why we maybe shouldn't rush to assume motives/suspects in these situations, and yet...
After all the other rampant speculation turned out to be absolutely wrong, your first thought it to start some more rampant speculation with no evidence?
If you read the article, it provides evidence that would support that theory
So did earlier articles about the subject before we found out who actually killed him.
It's OK to not know what happened, and to wait to find out.
It’s also ok to talk about what may have happened even if you find it gauche
> The witness saw Momeni asking Lee whether Momeni's sister had been "doing drugs or anything inappropriate" earlier that day. Lee had to "reassure" Momeni that "nothing inappropriate had happened," according to the documents.
Or health and safety related. I guess we’ll find out soon enough.
Not sure why it’s in quotations.
Because it's in reference to "honor killings" that still take place in certain cultures.
Familial violence against women, unfortunately, happens in all cultures. It gets called "honor killing" when it happens in a few of them.
Cultures where domestic violence is a crime are NOT the same as cultures where domestic violence is encouraged.
Cultures that have honor killings are the latter.
No, it is not socially acceptable (or even expected) to kill family members because they've done something which brings shame to the family in all cultures.
It's not "expected" (or "legal") anywhere. That's my point. Family annihilators exist globally and we imagine other societies approve of them.