no 3 day wait necessary, just 1 block
borrow money, buy enough of the governance token, launch a proposal to change treasurer to yourself, pass the proposal, withdraw from the treasury, sell tokens, return borrowed money
no 3 day wait necessary, just 1 block
borrow money, buy enough of the governance token, launch a proposal to change treasurer to yourself, pass the proposal, withdraw from the treasury, sell tokens, return borrowed money
web3isgoinggreat account with sources: https://web3isgoinggreat.com/?id=beanstalk-farms-stablecoin-...
Where TF is all this money coming from that gets invested in various NFTs, DeFi projects and exchanges, and more? It seems endless.
If you have a thing that everyone wants today, even if you invested zero dollars in it back in the day, it may be worth a mil. (However, if it turns out the thing is not so great it can cost half a cent the next day.)
There are orders of magnitude more Defi projects than the ones that get exploited and posted about.
And the projects that get exploited go more days without incident, like construction sites.
Think of if as if you evaluated the entire tech sector based on an international headline of a single phishing attack. You would have a skewed view that leads you to ask the same question, because there are always phishing attacks and little coverage of a deeper conversation. That’s kind of how it was 25 years ago in tech. Now people largely ignore that and talk about what organizations build, while the other problems never went away.
In the UK for example, the amount of pounds in circulation has more than doubled in the last decade. This money supply grows with how much banks lend, and 80% or so of that lending is for housing i.e. speculation and investment.
All of that created money needs to go somewhere once it becomes more fungible than real estate, and that's how you got NFTs, Tesla and so on.
Now don't get me wrong, money is debt and always has been, far before the invention of symbolic currency. I'm not one of these gold standard idiots. I'm just concerned that a trust based system doesn't scale very well.
I mean Bitfinex did it with Tether, in two directions as well; they pre-minted loads of this currency, then sold it for USD while at the same time allowing people (and themselves) to buy BTC with Tether, artifically boosting the value of BTC and the BTC that they themselves held, which helped them pay off the debts from their various breaches.
More about the rubes who see some new NFT advertised, and think, "Oh, that's going to go to the Moon!" and plunk down some actual money for it. I guess I'm surprised we haven't run out of rubes yet. Yes, I know human foolishness is a renewable resource, but at some point I'd think most of the easily accessible rubes have been used up (i.e. had their wallets drained), and it would be a while before a new crop of rubes is available in sufficient quantity for exploitation.
and then on the legal side with arbitrage bots (MEV and more), they also like to play around in the ecosystem, chase passive income in protocols and DAOs like everyone else.
speaking of everyone else, there are plenty of people with clearly legal funds, this post is just not about them.
its a whole parallel economy, where transactions simply aren't whitelisted, just as the people spent the last decade building due to the friction involved with whitelisting transactions unnecessarily. its here, this is how it works.
illicit fund users can cash out as well, whenever they want their local fiat money.
were they the person that launched the project (that got bought out by the laundered money)? congratulations.
were they one of the early believers of the project (that they also launched, that also got bought out by the laundered money?) congratulations, they have high capital gains just like any other lucky trader that "did their own research".