The reason was a Wikimedia Foundation request.
The reason was a Wikimedia Foundation request.
On its own, not harmful. That being said, it ran afoul of the WMFs trademarks and was actively confusing people with regular Mediawiki, which is likely what prompted the takedown. You can read the ins and outs on Wikipedias own page about mirrors and forks, there's an explanation listed there[1].
Codeberg likely complied because if you're weighting a vaguely conspiratorial-minded (the developer of Wikiless is a "feds in the walls" type if it wasn't obvious from the previous paragraph) proxy tool against possibly being shut down since you decided to stand up for an easy trademark violation, the choice is easy.
[0]: I'd like to note that as far as I can tell, no such tooling exists on Wikipedia, nor does the WMF employ the usual culprit (ad networks) of that kind of nonsense.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/VW...
Very few providers will shoulder the risk of being dragged to court to stand in front of you when legal is involved. Most don't have the funding to go the legal route to begin with, so they just comply. "We'll go to court for you" isn't a selling point of Codeberg, which makes it silly to expect it.
"Codeberg responded to orenom's request for explanation on the same day" does change things. You didn't include this in your previous comment from what I can see. Thanks for pointing it out.
The whole project has been broken ever since.
The project also doesn't actually make clear if it's actually private and not just MITMing it's own users to track them - as has been pointed out on several[0][1] privacy focused browser extensions that haphazardly included Wikiless.
[0]: https://framagit.org/tom79/nitterizeme/-/issues/61#note_1122...
[1]: https://github.com/SimonBrazell/privacy-redirect/issues/232#...
https://web.archive.org/web/20221125051241/https://orenom.fi...
The repo: https://codeberg.org/orenom/wikiless