How India’s caste system manifests in Seattle-area workplaces and beyond
seattletimes.com
seattletimes.com
It is also unfortunate and silly that a lot of those entitled upper-caste people have a false sense of supremacy because of no reason other than belonging to a specific caste, even if it gave them no practical advantage. As someone who witnessed multiple events of discrimination and meaningless hatred, I was able to spread this awareness to my friends and within my social circle in hopes that they can try to help someone somewhere and help more people get that awareness.
Another potentially upsetting fact is that a shocking majority of politicians who don't do any real things for the society retort to caste-based unification to gain support and votes from people belonging to certain castes. It's ridiculous that this one blinding blanket called "caste" also helps reap a lot of votes and popularity for them.
There is some good news here as well - cities and new generations of youth seem to be developing maturity and also at the same time holding little to no regard for caste system anymore. I urge you all Indians to do the same and kill the fucking bitch of that caste system once and for all. Feel free to encourage more inter-cast, inter-religion marriages, and shut down people who initiate those caste-supremacy talks at any point, regardless of who they are. Good changes in society always start with not being afraid.
This is difficult and will not happen in one or two generations. This cannot be regulated or incentivised into happening.
It will take much more introspection from each and every one of us. It requires each of us to awaken to the suffering we bring unto ourselves and unto those around us. Till that day comes, each system and -ism will continue to thrive.
I shared a personal experience on another HN thread of the same type. It might give some insight into this problem: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34876455
Hating on a system of hate will not solve the issue. Becoming aware of the potential hate within each of us, accepting that the hate is a coping mechanism for fear, and then discarding it is the only way forward. It starts by looking within each of us, and then changing our own lives, and hoping that this sets an example for those around us, who can choose to follow and change, or may also choose to continue in their set ways.
But upper castes are in denial about how caste plays out in the rest of India.
They will claim it was something in the past. Wrong. Upper castes still often whisper about so and so being a *** (impolite way of referring to someone of a lower caste), or about such and such work (e.g. cleaning dishes) being the work of a *** and not a Brahmin like themselves.
Some now claim that caste was created by the British.
Wrong. Al Biruni (traveler from Persia) in 1020 wrote in Tarikh Al-Hind (History of India) about how when there was a communal meal in the village, a barrier needed to be put up between people of lower castes and people of upper castes.
My own personal experiences with caste (as someone exposed to it very late in life) were described here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31035615
A rich Brahmin is, therefore by definition, not a Brahmin...and should be regarded as an outcaste and shunned.
And that's exactly what I tell them when they judge me for not having a caste.
You're describing a sanyasin.
A typical Brahmin, like anyone else is recommended to go through the usual stages of life including that of a Grihastha. And as a Grihastha, one is expected to pursue wealth and material wellbeing.
I'm all for telling off casteist scum but it probably helps to be accurate.
A wealthy Brahmin was therefore, by definition not a Brahmin.
> the status of the Brahmin caste as the "uppermost" or "holiest" caste was that they were the priestly caste, and skipped the Grihastha stage,
You linked to the section that specifically prescribes conduct during the Grihastha stage. That contradicts your assertion that Brahmins are supposed to skip the Grihastha stage.
> A wealthy Brahmin was therefore, by definition not a Brahmin.
The very section you linked to says He shall be either one possessing a granary full of grains. Accumulation of wealth is explicitly allowed.
"‘Four kinds of livelihood for householders have been described by the wise—the first is the possessing of a granary-full of grains; then the possessing of a jar-full of grains; then the possessing of not enough for the morrow; and the last is the method of the pigeon (having nothing beyond the present meal); among these the following is superior to the preceding.’
If you define this stage to mean materialistic wealth, then the Brahmins skip this stage. If you define this to mean the stage of one's life where material wealth is accumluated, then you would be correct that Brahmins pass through this stage, but only by shirking the accumulation of material wealth for religious pursuit.
Therefore, by definition, a Brahmin as historically defined cannot be wealthy, anymore than a Catholic priest can bear children and still call themselves a priest.
> Four kinds of livelihood for householders
The entire section is describing the conduct of householders. You are confusing the four permissible means of livelihood for householders with the four stages of life.
> If you define this stage to mean materialistic wealth, then the Brahmins skip this stage.
Again, where the does the text imply that Brahmins skip a stage? This is something you've just made up.
> but only by shirking the accumulation of material wealth for religious pursuit
Again, not implied anywhere in the text and something you made up.
Are you serious? They got upset they could not pigeon hole you? Damn.
>“why would I even report to HR when they probably don’t even know where India is on a map?” (Much less, understand the complexity of caste.)
Who are these HR people who don't try their best to get to know employees, and to make them feel comfortable on the workplace ?
I thought most HR departments would include sociology graduates, or at least sensible people, who have the curiosity to understand networks of power inside the company. How do you manage a company when you can't understand the actual hierarchy and influences among workers ?
Also, the case of the manager is highly inappropriate as well. He should just be fired.
Lastly
> “People would only want to live with roommates from their own caste,” she said.
Good riddance to bad rubbish! Who would want to share a flat with morons, anyway ? You can just find actual friends at uni to share a flat.
And with their mindset, I doubt they can actually settle down. I heard that my company had issues with some Indian workers who moved in, when they expected HR to find them a flat, fix their oven, arrange taxis, or run their errands,... because they were 'elite' as well.
I'm in France. They have 'equality' in their motto, and are proud of an history of being at the literal cutting edge of mechanical engineering to chop all heads in a republican way : equally (but especially them of the elites). So as far as I heard, it upset some locals who were suddenly considered Untermenschen by an 'elite' guy who just moved in.
But it's just an history of the past. So I'm not sure some of these guy made a long time around here.
This just seems to be a case of mismatch in expectations. Companies around the world provide expatriate relocation packages. The idea being expats wouldn't be familiar with how things are done in a foreign countries.
I don't understand why you think this was relevant to the topic.
It's rather silly to poffer caste privilege as an explanation just because the individuals in question happened to be Indian.
>because they were 'elite' as well.
For example: _AI teams primarily Chinese, where everyone speaks Chinese at team lunches and in team meetings and where non Chinese are very, very much the minority _Predominantly Israeli orgs and teams where most managers are also Israeli or of similar ethnic background, where it seems the promotion bar is lower for people of the same ethnic background as in the rest of the company. _Indian managers who are much harder on Indian employees than on non Indian employees. I've had to report an Indian manager to HR for bullying her Indian engineers before...
I work in a FAANG and I see the pattern in many orgs.
What would be local word for this hedious system ?
Eventually the idea of CRT(critical race theory) is to align the “racism” in west is because of casteism in India.
This seems like system like “dowry” which started with good intentions & still has value but has become a “daemon” in its own.
Still makes me think about origin, because origin usually has the solution to problems.
As a post-Hindu culture, we used to have the four castes (I think the Balinese still use them for marriages and stuffs), but never as strict as in India. Still, the generation that destroyed it (in the 1600s-1800s) found themselves stuck in another racist-classist caste system of Europeans on the top, "Orientals" on the middle, and natives on the bottom.
The solution to that was inverting the colonial racist system for a while. Fortunately we stopped after only 2-3 generations.
We still don't have perfect equality though - but much better than previously. One can not change his skin, but he can change his wealth level.
Caste is used to refer to both Varna and Jati. OP is trying to pretend that the lexical gap implies that the caste system is of foreign origin.
Jati are like “bhel”, “Khasi”. Varna has he mentioned above.
Check local language, it’s gives better perspective rather than imposed idea.
The hierarchy in Europe is
Clergy, Nobility, Landowners, Merchants, Tradesmen, Peasants, People working with sewage, carcasses etc...
The fact that the Church had a monopoly on god gave rise to the rigid hierarchies. The king was the representative of god and was conferred powers through the church.
When the colonialists set foot in India, they were faced with a problem there were too many gods & no central authority. The modern hierarchies and pyramids that you are presented with is an oversimplification and invention of the British to centralize their control.
Many European carry their family profession in their surname, this is often understood as caste in modern India.
So well put, in terms origin, problem & solutions.
But by the way, how do the “upper castes” see westerners?
The first group is those who live a dual life. Different moral compass for West and a different for back home. They put on a good facade and are often reserved when expressing their views about caste and stuff. They are the “no politics” version of your friend circle.
The second group is of those people who accept it (the values) completely and practice it and even try to bring this topic back home and get ousted socially because of the brutal backlash they get. These people are usually not very vocal and try to keep it to themselves and often have Western friends more than the friends from their own community. They are also lambasted by other two groups for trivial reasons like their wives dressing in shorts or posting beach pictures on facebook or for their “accent” for sounding too American/Aussie/Canadian. This group suffers a lot. They are not Western enough for Westerns and they are not authentic enough for the other two groups. They are always a minority everywhere they go.
And there’s this last group, the Western values messes up their whole thought process. They cry discrimination when it’s them at the receiving end but otherwise, West is a money making machine. Accept the monetary benefits but reject the social values of equality and individualism. They are also very vocal and supportive of the regressive values back home and often invent various arguments to support them somehow.
Disclaimer: this is my anecdotal theory based on my interaction with different Indian communities.
But I can tell you that casteism in India, and the degree of it, is not uniformly distributed throughout India.
There are some states and regions where marrying outside your caste is signing your own death warrant, and people from so-called upper castes don't even share tables with lower caste people.
But there are some areas where casteism is non-existent, and inter-caste marriage is rampant, and a small fraction of inter-caste relations are even arranged marriages.
Northern states are the hotbed of castiesm where it is overt and violent and there are honor killings. In South, it is covert, and appears in form of virtues signalling, power sharing, not intermarrying, etc.
The western regions have some lower form of casteism. And in the eastern regions, it is quite non-existent.
I live in the state of West Bengal, and I have never seen overt casteism. Inter-caste relations and marriages are rampant.
What led to this change?
Buddhism had a very strong foothold here historically.
Then ~500 years ago Bhakti movement that does not recognizes caste but only one's devotion was very popular.
Then Calcutta and Bengal was the seat of British rule for decades.
Then three decades of Communist rule up to 2010 destroyed the state's economics, but communality and casteism is low.
And there are places in India, where castiesm is lower. Like Kerala.
There was very popular anti-caste movement in Tamil Nadu: look up Periyar.
So, casteism isn’t uniformly present in the same degree in India, and it can be gotten rid of, through effort.
Some news of castiesm:
Denial of entry to temple:
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/clash-ov...
Honor killing for marrying:
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/clash-ov...
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/clash-ov...
Dalit killed for KEEPING A MOUSTACHE:
https://article-14.com/post/killed-for-sporting-a-moustache-...
Dalit killed for sitting in a chair in a wedding:
https://article-14.com/post/killed-for-sporting-a-moustache-...
Dalit killed for riding a horse:
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/for-riding-horse-upp...
Intercaste marriages barely make up 10% of the total in West Bengal. That's actually slightly lower than the national average. We don't need to reach for Buddhism, Bhakti or the British for postfacto explainations because there's nothing extraordinary here that needs an explanation.
And if you think casteism isn't prevalent in Kerala and Tamil Nadu, perhaps you would be interested in acquiring an ownership stake in the Pamban Bridge.
Do you have links to such demographic data I can read, because I am a little surprised. In my extended (Bengali) family there are many of inter-caste and inter-language marriages. Personal and anecdotal experience can of course differ from the population level norm, but genuinely curious.
I have seen places where caste doesn't matter at all in India but unfortunately this system is prevalent in the very fabric of Indian society. Even at the places where it doesn't matter you'll still hear about it even if it is just a curious query from somebody.
There is no law that upholds the caste system. Caste discrimination is criminal offense, and affirmative action is in-place. Its more of systematic societal problem, which can only be fixed if the society is large is properly integrated and educated.