HN is a curated site; it always has been. One of the things we have to do, to keep it interesting, is to prevent it from getting too repetitive. If you want to understand more about the principles that this place operates by, here are some links to past explanations. If you read some of those and still have a question that isn't answered there, I'd be happy to take a crack at it.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
I just don't see how a grinchy investor squeezing a company for more layoffs counts as a story about which there is anything surprising. HN has had hundreds of posts and many major discussions (surely dozens by now) about layoffs at tech companies. Once a topic has gotten that level of coverage, follow-up posts need to contain significant new information* in order to count as on topic. This is just standard HN moderation.
If this investor actually got Google to lay off a bunch more people and there was evidence showing this, I suppose that might be interesting... maybe. But sending a letter? How is that a significant story?
* https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
Our new buddy Chris, in his own words, un-covers all the shitty corpospeak, all the bullshit about focus, values, alignment, performance and lets not forget - the so called "corporate social responsibility" etc. for what it really is - greed and maximising profits at the cost of people who build these companies.
The immorality of someone probably not working at all, who dares openly incite a disruption of the livelihoods of at least 12k working families should not be hidden from the public, least of all from the segment frequenting sites like HN.
It is important because for one high-profile like this, there are thousands of MBA-types at smaller companies who are learning by watching and who inevitably pass it down the line and spread the disease of these practices everywhere. We need to publically call these people out and ostracise their dangerous practices.
This topic was trending on the frontpage before you hid it.
How many people here contributed to this thread? The topic was clearly interesting to many and is clearly super-relevant.
Please put it back on and allow for the discussion to continue.
Lots of things trend on the front page before they get downweighted, whether by user flags or by moderation downweights. That's how HN works and has always worked. The system can't go by upvotes alone* - if it did, the front page would consist of nothing but sensationalism, rage, and the same few hottest topics upvoted over and over again.
* https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...