>private information
It is publicly available information.
It is publicly available information.
The information is publicly available because it is mandated to be as a condition of flying. Leaked private information is obviously different.
This is just a case of a billionaire with a god complex wanting to have his cake and eat it too.
No, it's not.
Elon's jet receives a private temporary aircraft identifier unconnected to its owner every month, because it is subscribed to this program: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/equipadsb/privacy
This government program was specifically designed to hide the link between an aircraft identifier and the owner of the aircraft.
If the link between Elon Musk and the aircraft identifier he flies with was meant to be publicly available, why does this program exist in the first place?
If I were to put together a badly implemented privacy program that people can trivially circumvent without breaking the law, who should be blamed when people do exactly that?
Me, or the people doing the trivial yet legal circumvention?
Wrong. None of Musk's planes are part of the PIA program: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34037524 as evident by any ads-b map out there.
There is plenty of information in public records like people's addresses that are released legitimately. An address is enough information to SWAT someone.
Nope. A lot of it comes from public sources, such as property taxes, vehicle registrations, court records...
It's still doxxing.
Virtually all doxxing is derived from public records.
What’s public is how each plane moves. What’s not is which one of these planes is Musk’s.
This is not "hacking". This is information derived from publicly available information, presumably a quite trivial inference. If it is public information that x=2 and y=3, then x+y=5 isn't suddenly private information, just because it requires a trivial inference.
Just because it’s easy to uncover doesn’t mean it’s fine to go off and broadcast it. That’s doxxing.
It’s only the web browser that hides that stuff.
If a later change to Chrome makes EXIF data easily viewable is then a privacy concern?
It’s not a trivial inference.