It makes me wonder though - what's he thinking? How can he think these interviews are a good strategy? Is he an idiot, or does he have a really amazing plan?
I think the idea is that anyone who’s seen his stupid interviews is a “tainted” juror, so if he’s tainted most potential jurors, it becomes more difficult to try him. Not sure how true this actually is
Would the person who downvoted me explain the reason? I don't understand the connection between doing stupid interviews and making jury selection difficult.
I think he's trying to convince people he's an idiot, ergo, not fraud. Nice try Mr. MIT Physics grad, minor math, 4-year Jane Street International ETF trader.