Hopefully his "bad month" becomes "a few bad years in jail" and we never have to hear him give another interview to pretend this fraud was just incompetence for some time.
It makes me wonder though - what's he thinking? How can he think these interviews are a good strategy? Is he an idiot, or does he have a really amazing plan?
He's trying to make jury selection difficult.
I'm very curious, wanna give us more information?
Would the person who downvoted me explain the reason? I don't understand the connection between doing stupid interviews and making jury selection difficult.
I think the idea is that anyone who’s seen his stupid interviews is a “tainted” juror, so if he’s tainted most potential jurors, it becomes more difficult to try him. Not sure how true this actually is
If it works, give the man an Oscar.
I think he's trying to convince people he's an idiot, ergo, not fraud. Nice try Mr. MIT Physics grad, minor math, 4-year Jane Street International ETF trader.
Should be life imprisonment really, not just a few bad years.