Alternatively, NATO could say that they can shoot down any Russian missiles since Russia cannot be trusted and has bad aim.
It's really suspicious that two missiles hit Poland. If it were one missile, it could be due to some kind of component failure that caused the missile to go off course.
Two missiles are not likely to both fail, so that suggests Poland was targeted on purpose.
Nothing suggests Poland was targeted on purpose besides your fear-based rhetoric / war mongering.
"Russia cannot be trusted and has bad aim".
This war has turned everyone into a bunch of Russophobes and has really helped to shine a light on how many racist-ass people live in Eastern Europe. Not really surprising though since they hero worship this guy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepan_Bandera - in Ukraine.
>My sources in the services say that what hit Przewowo is most likely the remains of a rocket shot down by the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
https://twitter.com/mariuszgierszew/status/15925955074275450...
40 miles from the border
What scares me is that everyone is speculating and jumping to conclusions without hard facts. Behaving this way can easily escalate some trivial situation into something more serious.
It's a bit of a waste of a sophisticated rocket, and the warhead is smaller, but the ones they fire tend to be reaching EOL anyway due to age. That, or lack of better alternatives.
So could still be Russian.
Stanisław Jerzy Lec said that it's shameful to suspect when you're certain. Russia has a well established reputation, so while investigation is needed, we can safely assume it's Russian rockets. We of course will be surprised if it happen to be false, but before that it should be logical to follow most likely explanation.
But there is no certainty here, just speculation.
"we can safely assume it's Russian rockets"
It's dangerous to assume anything when it could lead to WW3.
I honestly don't know ho to defend myself about that? Being ignorant to news is probably not good idea. But finding relevant information nowadays require significant amount of time. That is luxury that most people cannot effort so I guess majority easily jump to any kind of trends.
According to [1], Pentagon spokesperson Patrick Ryder said "we don't have any information at this time to corroborate those [press] reports"
[1] - https://www.dw.com/en/nato-investigating-reports-of-russian-...
Maybe Putin is testing the waters to see how NATO will respond?
What better way to see the limits of missile interception, how leaders will react, how unified or divided NATO members are, etc.