Wasn't the whole point of the initial subpoena complaint, "we're not a competitor to Meta?" and now that it's dropped, you're arguing why you're a competitor?
Trick Your adversary into a particular defense which you are prepared to demolish.
I'd be impressed by it if a single meta lawyer's salary wasn't more then the entire simulaVR budget.
as such it looks more like a giant evil corporation having it's way with a small defenseless individual just trying to manifest their own vision for VR.
As others have said, I love what youre doing with Simula, and the subpoena was out of place from Meta, but you've got to work on your communication.
TLDR: That post is from 2021, and we basically said that Meta's product vision is to start with a social network/gaming platform first, and then backwards engineer productivity into it as a third use case; whereas we want to start with productive VR computing as our first and only focus, and engineer everything we do around that.