A sour attitude definitely wasn't intended. Meta has some misleading marketing and we wanted to correct that. Apart from that we're just comparing our products, as the Quest Pro (unlike the Quest 2) does indeed intrude on our niche.
Trick Your adversary into a particular defense which you are prepared to demolish.
I'd be impressed by it if a single meta lawyer's salary wasn't more then the entire simulaVR budget.
as such it looks more like a giant evil corporation having it's way with a small defenseless individual just trying to manifest their own vision for VR.
As others have said, I love what youre doing with Simula, and the subpoena was out of place from Meta, but you've got to work on your communication.
TLDR: That post is from 2021, and we basically said that Meta's product vision is to start with a social network/gaming platform first, and then backwards engineer productivity into it as a third use case; whereas we want to start with productive VR computing as our first and only focus, and engineer everything we do around that.
My main concern with the future is Ergonomics. We are practically talking about a cybernetic-interface here. It isn't cheap or easy to solve. Above all else I feel like people really just hate having a thing strapped to their face.