[1] https://www.equityinhighered.org/indicators/enrollment-in-gr...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_Sta...
[3] https://www.statista.com/chart/15685/doctoral-degrees-awarde...
[1] https://www.equityinhighered.org/indicators/enrollment-in-gr...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_Sta...
[3] https://www.statista.com/chart/15685/doctoral-degrees-awarde...
But that's grasping at straws — it really has no bearing on the article itself.
There are 2 pictures shown.
If you went to a campus and captured 2 such pictures of people at random, it would be completely common for both pictures to end up like the ones in the article.
Yes. But if a Washington Post photographer went (or chose the pictures), it's vanishingly uncommon. A duckduckgo image search, limited to washingtonpost.com, of "phd graduation", "phd students", "phd graduate", "graduation", or "university students", yields almost no such pictures. Almost all are either very diverse, or entirely black.
They only find whites when it comes to "elites" "dominating".