This comment sounds AI-generated. If you’re a real person can you explain the point you were trying to deliver and why you chose to write this way?
I've met some old-school hippies who actually talk like that, and appear to completely believe the pseudoscience.
Oh, I remember that word now: "pseudoscience"; it used to be regurgitated everytime someone stepped into a pool of reality-altering facts. They never manage to pin down the 'pseudo' or the 'science', or contribute (like old-school hippies) anything to the collective.
Yeah, but sell a finger for the price of a lid, and your hippie suddenly believes in concrete facts, scientific measurements and capitalism...
{concrete facts, scientific measurements and capitalism} add up to 'hippie', brau.
You mean self importance?
Oh come on: would someone with an ounce of self-importance be preaching 'wake up, neo' to a bunch of stale-beer chugging nerds?
Machines do not have narrative-interpretation bugs associated with Superiority Complex, humans do, Arthur.
Is that what happened here? My head went in a few orbits over this comment.