Probably US will try to use the same strategy with China if this works well against Russia. That's my personal prediction. Once Russia is weaken, US will move immediately on China.
Probably US will try to use the same strategy with China if this works well against Russia. That's my personal prediction. Once Russia is weaken, US will move immediately on China.
1) on YouTube, there are many talks from American scholars, officials and intelligence talked about Ukraine, and predicted this conflict, even before the invasion, US insists that (although NATO doesn't want Ukraine) Ukraine has right to join NATO. US has trained Ukraine to be the frontline to fight Russia, knowing Russia would take action in response to NATO's plan;
2) US and UK are not worried the war would affect them directly, they are pushing to continue this conflict to bleed Russia economy and military, while other European countries who have a lot to lose want this conflict to end;
3) This war is not really about Russia and Ukraine, it is a war between Russia and US. To US's advantage, it is a proxy war where US does not need to participate directly. I believe US is more than happy to have this war than a direct conflict (which would result casualties and push back by voters);
4) Because this is mainly a US-Russia conflict, only US and Russia can stop this. US has shown no interests of deescalating the situation, instead, US has been using this as an opportunity to criticizing China, taking advantages of the situation. So far, US has not called for negotiation at all.
In response to your question, here is what Putin said:"It is not our plan to occupy the Ukrainian territory." (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-24/full-tran...)
I think Putin's stupid to do this, look at history of war, US's 20 years in Afghanistan, 20 years in Iraq, how can you invade a country? Maybe his plan was to get rid of Zelensky quickly.
I agree the West's hot-cold meddling does not paint a rosy picture, and if we were just discussing covert actions in the Donbas/Crimea, your narrative could make sense. But once we're talking about open war, the relativism drops away and the aggressor becomes very clear - many Russian troops are occupying Ukrainian territory, while no Ukrainian troops are occupying Russian territory.
As far as US deescalation - what exactly do you think there is for the US to give? Ukraine's right of free association is not the US's to give away.
Ukraine is at loss, Russia will be weaker, it is a good strategy for the US, Europe will spend more money (but they are rich). The developing world is going to suffer with the food price and energy prices. Developing world is going to bear the cost of the war and sanctions.
From US the point of view, not deescalation is the best option. You know what US could give? Just tell Ukraine that NATO is not the best option for it, could be behind doors, I am sure US does this all the time. Unfortunately Ukraine was not discouraged, rather encouraged to pursue a dead end.