Why I will never buy another Samsung device
lehtimaeki.medium.com
lehtimaeki.medium.com
For example, they take screenshots of what you watch on your Samsung Televisions!
Don't believe me? Take it from them: https://www.samsung.com/us/business/samsungads/resources/tv-... and https://www.samsung.com/us/business/samsungads/insights/
You're not their customer, you're the product.
Additionally, Samsung have a habit of releasing forced updates that almost-but-not-entirely brick their TVs, slowing them down to molasses. They do this right before the next model becomes available for purchase.
Last but not least, a colleague worked there as a consultant, and his stories of their lax IT security were nearly unbelievable. Even though they spy on you like Google or Facebook, they are not like a FAANG when it comes to protecting your private info! They've been hacked for sure, probably by multiple nation state actors. Whatever you watch or do with their TVs is being relayed to the US, Russians, Chinese, or whomever. Assume that nothing you do with a Samsung device or Samsung software is remotely secure or safe.
They're a slimy company made up of unscrupulous people trying to squeeze every last drop out of every rock.
Don't give them your money. There are many other companies with much better track records.
I admit, I think my source was probably HN comments. I tend to trust them more than they deserve.
I did a Google, and it seems a very sketchy claim.
Why yes, this is a ludicrous amount of technical work to expect the average consumer to do, and it is fucking disgusting that this is even a concern. I'll continue to use my 8 year old TV, I don't need 4k for something I'm watching from 8 feet away anyway.
I had to DMZ a friend's smart TV, since it was booting excessively slowly waiting for a response from the (Sony) servers, which is why I have a work around. Still, spending $35 and polluting the 2.5ghz band even more seems stupid. The TV in question had an ethernet port, but providing 400 responses on that didn't improve boot times, since it tried to find a wifi signal after that. Just stupid that a TV will be slow to turn in depending on what external servers it can contact.
Edit-stated this was an LG TV, it was a Sony.
Got any suggestions on external streamers that don’t have the same problem as a smart tv?
i mainly use it with the jellyfin plugin so all of my media is stored on a NAS and kodi just acts as the player
It does contact Panasonic but I have blocked the domains with a Pihole and closed outgoing port 53 other than traffic from the Pihole so nothing can make DNS requests directly (eg. hardcoded to 8.8.8.8).
The TV itself is great though. It runs FirefoxOS I believe.
The TV is not as bad as the LG I had before it which sent a web request to LG every time you pressed a button on the remote control... volume up.... web request to LG. Volume down... TV sent a web request to LG.
My OLED has Netflix etc. I used the built in Netflix a few times but don’t anymore since because I don’t use Netflix altogether and not subscribed to them. I put it on a special VLAN that has no internet access but can still send and receive traffic to my home assistant instance so as far as the tv is concerned, it’s offline. But it’s never nagged me about it. And when it was fully online (when using the Netflix app), I never received any ad anywhere.
> It does contact Panasonic but I have blocked the domains with a Pihole and closed outgoing port 53 other than traffic from the Pihole so nothing can make DNS requests directly (eg. hardcoded to 8.8.8.8).
I don't understand - you've blocked it from contacting Panasonic; does that mean that none of the services work any more? Or is there another domain that it has to keep in contact with that you've allowed? If so, why block the Panasonic domain when you allow it to chat to some other third party?
ichnaea.netflix.com collect-eu-fy2017.myhomescreen.tv x2.vindicosuite.com
But it is allowed to access other domains such as: nrdp.prod.ftl.netflix.com api-global.netflix.com vcs.vdspf.com push.prod.netflix.com uiboot.netflix.com appboot.netflix.com auth-ctv.digitaluk.co.uk c09.api.freeviewplay.net secure.netflix.com
Nothing on the network other than the Pi can get out of port 53 (DNS).
I had been looking at Sony before that and saw that they had promised their users for a couple years to release the same 4k 120hz VRR update for a number of bravia models. to date they either didn't release it, or released flawed implementation. There were so many complaints online it steered me clear of Sony.
I then went into the store thinking to buy LG but Panasonic looked very nice. I watched a ton of reviews from HDTVtest on YouTube and took a gamble with the Panasonic. The calibration of the set is very much better than my old Samsung. Night and day.
In the end it was cheaper and I've been very happy.
I also trust Google to have fewer glaring security issues than Samsung.
Source? On Android with Google Play Services, which almost always applies to Android TV as they’re essentially the same OS, there are no UI toggles to turn off the spying. You can check this using a DNS proxy, for instance, and viewing the log after blocking Google domains using such a proxy might prove quite alarming. Android devices even with location and search tracking disabled contact Google every several minutes.
If you turn these off, particularly "Web & app history", your TV (and all other Google devices) will obey the settings if it is logged into that Google account.
It will still be contacting Google's servers, but it won't be recording anything.
Or are they just not showing you, via your UI, what they're collecting into their data pools anymore?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29990910
TL:DR- LG CX tv, never connected to the internet, "smart" functions come from a separate device. It's also behind a pihole for what it's worth.
I currently use an Apple TV 4K for all my apps, it integrates perfectly with the TV using HDMI CEC and has a clean content-focused UI that's not stuffed with ads (had been considering Android TV).
I will never use a Samsung TV again after my last experience of performance-crippling firmware, nagging, confusing/off-screen opt-out UIs for spyware features, attempting to bypass DNS if telemetry is blocked, and ad-stuffing (KS8000) - nor allow a TV to have a persistent network connection.
This really doesn’t bother me at all.
Edit: From the links you sent it doesn't explicitly say it sends screenshots. It sounds more like the ACR is run on device and then the result of that is sent to Samsung.
- I'm angry because people let their dogs poop on my garden
- People let their dogs poop on my garden too and I'm not bothered by it!
Who’s talking about illegal stuff?
When you write "this doesn't bother me" when people complain, what should they think?
No, it doesn't bother me that they show me ads about products I'm actually interested in based on what they know about me. Not only it means that I don't get bothered with things I would most likely not be interested in, it also means that advertising costs go down significantly allowing the market to produce very niche products which would otherwise not be viable. Targeted ads is the best thing that has happened to the economy in the last decades.
The issue you raised about getting targtted ads is fine, I don't think many will dissagree with you, but its about having the option to turn it off. Theres the disconnect. When you're forced into an ecosystem that you cant tailor, it leaves a bad taste.
Facebook, Samsung and Google let you turn this functionality off. They're legally required to do so in parts of the world but they give this option to everyone.
I recon from an individual perspective, ads are not a game changer to consumer behavior. They only burden the individual with more decisions to make when choosing a product to buy. Infact, in today's standards they only serve as a way to guess-timate person X bought toothpaste B because of ad campaign Z. Therefore, give us (ad broker Y) some of that kickback. When I still would have bought the toothpaste anyway.
Why would they let you disable ads on their ad-supported platform? There are plans like YouTube premium if you want no ads in there, which I think is worth it and I do pay for it because it is a much better YouTube experience.
By using ad blockers, you are merely taking away from everyone else using the platform. I wish these companies did more to stop ad blockers.
>I recon from an individual perspective, ads are not a game changer to consumer behavior.
That's because from what you wrote, you don't seem to understand how these ad platforms work.
Because they stand to gain (immensely) from building my trust about their model of advertising if I choose to participate in it. Or maybe am being too optimistic and everyone would disable ads 100% of the time given such an option? Would be an awesome experiment for Google :)
The problem with these platforms you call ad-supported, is even when you pay a subscription for premium the content creators are allowed to slot in sponsored segments which isn't exactly my definition of an ad-free experience.
> By using ad blockers, you are merely taking away from everyone else using the platform. I wish these companies did more to stop ad blockers.
Taking away what exactly? If you could be a bit more specific. Also, you are free to dream in your utopia where ad blockers don't serve a need, just don't expect everyone to follow you there.
> That's because from what you wrote, you don't seem to understand how these ad platforms work
Would be happy if you could explain where I got it wrong.
They're not gaining out of thin air. They're making a commission on how much they are saving for the advertisers (and hence the advertisees). They're creating immense value, of which, they are taking a small commission. If they were not creating immense value, the advertisers would have no need to use them. They would continue to make their businesses big enough to buy Superbowl ads (or equivalent).
> Taking away what exactly?
By blocking the ads, other people are paying for YOUR use of these services. It's the moral equivalent of not paying taxes, although it is not illegal... yet.
> Would be happy if you could explain where I got it wrong.
For example, you think this is how ad targeting by Facebook and Google works:
> in today's standards they only serve as a way to guess-timate person X bought toothpaste B because of ad campaign Z
And you think this is true:
> ads are not a game changer to consumer behavior.
It's a complete waste of time for me to debate with someone who thinks ads don't affect consumer behavior.
I will just leave this here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25623858
You fail to prove why my logic is wrong and answer your own questions instead, then on top of that make sure to sprinkle vague insults at me! I won't bother providing rebuttals to the rest of your arguments. You make sure you have a good day, moron!
What I'm saying is that Facebook, Google and Samsung companies are not in the business of selling data like the common disinformation messaging would have you believe.
Those are the REALLY creepy ones, and yet, we never talk about them ...
Which is a shame, I love the roku for how easy it is to use. I'll continue to use it, since there isn't a easy to operate OSS alternative, but it is disappointing.
So yeah I agree with your friends that data mining your dishwasher in itself is rather innocuous, but why allow it to happen altogether and open yourself to all the above?
According to them, for laundry, they don't want clothes to sit there longer than necessary without being dried or folded. For the dishes, they want to make sure that they remembered to start the dishwasher without having to go check
Honestly Pixel should be the only android you consider as its the only phone that doesn't come loaded with trash spyware (outside of niche phones like Fairphone)
Google might have some spyware (e.g. play store). But it's not trash. I trust them to not get hacked (definitely more than Samsung or Huawei)
They also afaik have better support for replacing the stock firmware (although I've never done that)
For those inclined for more privacy, Pixels are one of the only phones that allow you to install de-googled Custom Roms without compromising the Android security model.
I know many people who use Fairphones and they've never been disappointed. You can still find the spare parts, remove the battery, and setup the OS you want. Be careful though the "setup your own OS" part may not be supported for a few months after a new model comes out so be sure to check the compatibility list on lineageos.org.
Unfortunately to my knowledge all other vendors are just scammers who will sell you half-functioning phone due to spyware bundled as part of the system (just try to remove Google Play Services :)) where you can't unlock the bootloader to setup your own system.
Second, because this is primarily due to economies of scale and predatory behavior from economic giants: if consumer/environmental protections don't outlaw ethical abuses from the few corporations who capture the market (see also planned obsolescence [1]), the "ethical" alternatives are always going to be more expensive and less attractive.
Third, because there are simple ways to have a strong impact immediately. For example, by forcing all hardware manufacturers to publish the entirety of their data sheets / schematics / research, you'd find a much better OS support for older devices (and new devices too), which would bring a practical incentive (cost) to use older hardware which currently has to be thrown away (for example if the OS does not support newer TLS standards [2]).
The situation is only bad because we let it be. Going with big tech for short-sighted, individualized gains, fails to address the elephant in the room that we as humanity can do so much better and everyone would be better off.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirth%27s_law
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence
[2] https://f-droid.org/pt/2020/05/29/android-updates-and-tls-co...
https://www.motorola.com/us/smartphones?ds_rl=1242193&ds_rl=...
So for example, everyone has local admin access, or even network-wide admin access. Instead of Active Directory accounts, users are tracked by their client IP address. In effect, you are your IP address on the network.
Most activity is logged, and then correlated by IP address so that blame can be assigned after-the-fact.
So for example, if you're caught editing a production web page live on the server while 40K people are scratching their heads wondering why they can't log in that morning, you'll get blamed because the remote connection came from your desktop IP when that happened.
Nothing stops some random junior developer editing the production web site on the fly. He'll just be reprimanded or fired.
(NOTE: Some of the specifics above may be out of date now, but the security culture likely remains)
Seems ripe for an insider threat - Sure, they'll catch and fire all the people who slip up or stupidly overstep their authorization or do some vandalism. But a determined and skilled attacker could come in at a very low level and install all kinds of interesting stuff... wow.
So I've banned the TV from my WIFI network, and I just have a PC plugged into it. Its less convenient this way - we need to pull out a wireless keyboard & mouse to watch netflix. But I think its the right call for sure.
In some ways I think I win on all counts like this. Modern smart tvs are subsidized by creepy advertising. This way I get a cheap TV, and I don't give up any privacy in doing so.
But I worry about a time when TVs ship with cheap 4G modems, and start doing telemetry that way. It might just be a matter of time. I can't be the only one who doesn't connect my tv to wifi; and I bet samsung has run the numbers.
Edit: or maybe a pi hole or something like nordvpn cybersec.
There are some wireless keyboards that looks like a remote, but with qwerty keys on the back, a touchpad / air mouse, and IR blaster with programmable key so you can ditch the original tv remote.
There is also an IR module you can hook into homeassistant to act as universal remote, so you can ditch all remotes and use your phone to control everything via homeassistant.
Monitors. I have a 40" monitor in my living room, connected to the cable company's STB. Not that that's regularly used, most of the time I use my HTPC instead, which runs Kodi.
Replacing it with a monitor of a comparable size would be prohibitively expensive.
I run Kodi on a Raspberry Pi for this exact reason. The Pi's HDMI has CEC support built-in, which means the TV's remote works seamlessly with Kodi's UI. This works great for my Netflix needs.
Unfortunately, most (all?) PC graphics don't do CEC out of the box. I've seen USB adapters that can add this functionality to PCs but I've never tried any of them.
I've actually come to appreciate the wireless keyboard though, it is awkward and bulky (even though it's a lightweight slim model) but the kids constantly lose the actual remote whereas the keyboard's size make losing it very difficult.
No comment about the 5G thing though. If that's where consumer is heading you'll find me shopping in the advertising/DOH display panel section and trying my hardest to ignore the irony :D
A smart TV wouldn't straight-out spy on an external use like this, would it?
I would love to upgrade from the 10 year old dumb Sanyo to something with a better picture. But, a friend who's in AV install and TV resale did some digging and there aren't options out there to buy.
I'm hoping some larger monitors will come out and fill in this gap for somebody spec hungry like myself, but doubtful.
Sure, they're huge companies - somewhere, some one is probably doing this for some edge case.
Either way - even at FB - I would be highly surprised if this data didn't get auto-deleted within a few weeks (at the latest).
And if you're telling me that Samsung is really that much different - I'm surprised - because there's not any way for them to monetize this data. They're just wasting storage and in the process creating a massive liability for themselves...
What is really annoying though is that you are their customer. It's sort of understandable when Google or Facebook spy on you and monetise your data to profit from the services that they provide you free of monetary charge to you. With Samsung, you've already handed over a few hundred dollars at least for the product. Spying on you as well is like having their customer and eating it.
I've always used Samsung's flagship smartphones, since the Galaxy S4. However, as I've become a more conscious consumer in recent years, I've decided that my next phone won't be a Samsung.
I had a samsung active2 watch. It advertised ECG, which didn't materialize until almost 2 years after the device was launched. When it finally got released you were only allowed to use that feature if the device was paired to a samsung phone.
For the longest time Samsung Pay was showing ads inside the app, like some random third party play store app.
Then, one day, I decided to go for a swim and the watch crashes, the speaker sucks water on boot and the device bricks. No button combination allows you to turn off the device without the touch screen. Even though it was an issue for the (IP68 rated) device samsung wanted to charge me $180 to repair it. Basically the price of a new watch 1.5 years ago.
Nowadays I look at Sony and Samsung devices and think, man such great looking devices, but wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole.
EDIT: some people say that in the EU they cannot lock you out of warranty for rooting the device, because non hardware modifications are not cause for warranty removal. But I haven't tried that, so I don't know.
Even if it’s not allowed in Europe, IIRC, unlocking and tripping the e-fuse comes with a new boot screen with a huge "unsecure device" that you can’t get rid of. And you are also definitely locked out of device encryption and Samsung Pay.
So even if warranty is not void, you are paying it by not being able to resell your phone (at least at a normal price).
I personally don't like that line of reasoning. If you start to justify abusive behavior in the name of making money you're not giving someone for a "service", it's a small leap to reach the conclusion that abusive behavior (and profiting from it) is justified no matter what as long as you've been provided some kind of service.
Either it's a gift, or it's a paid service. In neither cases does abusive behavior ever become justified, whether it's from a friend, a neighbor, or a multi-billion dollar company. If your company wants to offer me free donuts, that's your company's choice and does not grant you the right to follow me home and steal my books. Why would it be any different with Silicon Valley companies?
But it is absurd to insist the only two valid transaction models are offer paid service (which I assume means for money) or gift. Even in your hypothetical, it would not be unreasonable for them to give me a donut in exchange for taking notes on which donut I like and handing me a coupon for my next donut.
To me, the issue is not the data collection. It is the lack of transparency.
I don't exactly disagree, but it's hardly comparable. As a human being, i can grasp the notion of giving you 30 minutes of my time to try different cookie flavors and tell you what i think.
I could likewise understand the notion/consequences of filling a one-page questionnaire for Facebook's advertisement engine in exchange for free service. But i don't think implicit background data collection on anything they can (my phonebook, really?!) is a reasonable contract, because it's hard to comprehend what are the limits and consequences of that.
So it's not just "lack of transparency". I would consider it abusive behavior even if the sign up form read "I WILL FOLLOW AND WATCH YOU EVERYWHERE YOU GO AND TELL ALL MY FRIENDS ABOUT YOUR GREAT ADVENTURES"... especially considering they would probably make it look like a cute pet saying that. I would not consider it abusive behavior if their ad business was *not* collecting any information from the users (except maybe like i said a sign-up questionnaire) and was just doing advertisement.
Since everyone refuses to _directly_ spend money, companies just move to taking money from us indirectly. To me "free services" is like a casinos, its easy to say that you should "just not do/use it lmao" but its extremely hard to think back and consider why Reddit/Hackernews/Youtube/Twitter/Facebook is free and what are the consequences/incentives of it being "free" will mean to our society. It is simply too enticing.
And beside that I'd very much not want to give google money either. So I don't.
(yes, watching the ads gives them money, and blocking the ads and use youtube reinforces their monopoly. But it still feels better than also giving them cash directly).
And I hate it too, and for all the reasons given here. (Did not check them all, but it is a pretty safe bet.)
Hating it all means I am on board with activism, advocacy, law, whatever we need to do in order to establish / extend the Bill Of Rights into digital spaces.
Society, tech and the law have collided and that mess is ongoing and expanding. Imagine one of those cars smashing into a train with the dummy in it.
It crumples, folds, then pieces fly off, the dummy takes damage, and just down the track is a truck, and a bus with kids in it, and so on...
That train is heavy, well powered with spiffy tech, and it is powering right through the public!
Hate it, but I am quite sure I can't do much, even resisting, doing all the work to anonymize, is a total PITA. Drains the value right out of it all, out of me, my life, and I just do not have time for it, unless a lot of us have time together somehow.
And I think dollars are the only language our oppressors, abusers, and the like will both hear and act on because they must!
Lessig wrote about things that regulate our behavior:
Norms. They do not prevent anything, but do reward or punish.
Law. Like norms, but with real teeth well beyond praise and shunning.
Physics. The rules of the world will prevent actions. The more we understand, the more this world permits.
Money / markets. These also can prevent things. If we cannot afford an action...
It will take a lot of us setting norms, doing things that cost, and all of that rolling up into law more relevant than this current "wild west" is.
I really like it because I get to do things, have access to information that was the stuff of dreams not so long ago.
It is all as empowering as it is exploitative.
Yes, let's do this. Let's get together and create new, more humane standards. Get involved with an educational/cultural copyleft non-profit like Framasoft, a legal/lobbying organization like LQDN/EFF, a local hosting cooperative that provides GAFAM alternatives with a sustainable model (libreho.st/chatons.org networks), a local self-organized/DIY ISP (guifi.net/ffdn.org/freifunk.net networks), a self-organized FLOSS coop, etc.
That aside, yes! In my view, right now those of us able to do what just happened here need to continue. More will pick up on the, to us all too obvious dark patterns...
What to do in order to have this aspect of tech make better sense, augment, empower, add value, serve, rather than enslave, exploit, diminish, create dependence, is going to be the product of discussions we will not have, unless enough of us arrive at this all being an priority and understand the time is now, ish.
New law, and in that place where tech, law and society collide.
We are the ones, and we are because many remember times before all this, many may know nothing, this being all they have known.
It is the timing, mix of perspectives, newness of the tech and more which make this time special. We go too long and the inflection points may just evaporate...
A very similar thing happened with labor, resulting in the likes of the New Deal, by way of what I am trying (poorly, I feel) to get at here.
When we attempt solutions, those form a basis to build on and momentum to get it right, and have it work better for everyone. That matters.
The law is well behind, like we are leaving a "wild west" kind of time and that exit could have us see far worse before people move to address it. Or, it all could go better, sooner too.
I agree! Getting involved matters. Sharing it, particularly among "normies", who sense real trouble,,but do not understand well enough for that momentum to build matters too.
Great comment. Wish I had more and better answers. They will come as more of us seek them and amplify the good potential more than we currently amplify the growing bad.
Most of us don't. But we would like it to be:
- easy and anonymous: if i have cash i should be able to find a local reseller taking cash for a token of X€ (a token that's not specific to your platform would be even better)
- easy to decide where the money goes: i certainly don't want to give Google any money at all (and they don't need it), and i certainly don't want my money to be used against my will to finance a reptilian-aware neonazi whose video i clicked by accident (or because i had to debunk it)
But, to be fair, i would much rather prefer a system based on cooperation and free sharing. Is there a reason why we have to pay to live? The reason artists need money is the same reason bakers or FLOSS devs need money: because everyone else does and we're trapped in this nightmarish system. I feel that as a species we can do better.
Google Rewards
I use both and am yet to find the "monetise your data" stuff abusive. It's mostly things like trying to show an ad for mortgages if they figure you need a mortgage. Honestly with the various forms of death and hunger and real bad stuff in the world I'd feel a bit of a snowflake freaking out over someone trying to show me an ad for something they figure I may need.
Fair point, but it's all related. The global wealth we have as a planet could provide everyone with decent housing, food and healthcare. Instead it's being owned by a minority who dedicated resources to making things worse for everyone else.
The IT industry in particular largely benefits from human rights abuses in mining operations and in the factories on the hardware side, and from big contracts with tyrannical regimes on the software side (Amazon + ICE? Google + China?).
The problem is we largely live in a globalized culture in which "exploit others before they exploit you" (the paradigm we're taught in schools/media) is the norm. We are enough technologically-advanced to have a world without war and hunger, but not as long as psychopaths are socially rewarded.
Although I've become more privacy conscious in recent years, I'm not even sure I can agree that the bargain offered by the ad tech companies is objectively unreasonable. What I can conclude is that it is highly opaque, many people are sleepwalking into it without fully considering its ramifications, and I personally am not comfortable with it.
Samsung's practice of taking your money, offering you a product and then taking your data as well is a particularly dark pattern because it strays even more from the reasonable expectations of consumers.
I don't know where you live, but here in France it's the other way around. You can pay with cash pretty much in any shop, but it's expensive on vendors to provide card payments. And the real problem is millions of people don't have a credit card due to being blacklisted (for debt) or undocumented immigrant. That's why for example Lycamobile/Lebara are the most popular phone service providers among the lower classes in France: you can find SIM cards and "tip-up" cards pretty much everywhere.
Of course, this raises the question on how to pay on the Internet with cash as i know a lot of people who can't buy stuff online. For people who want to pay online (and have a bank account), taler.net seems like the most promising R&D in the field of "digital cash". For the rest, i can't see why we couldn't have a tip-up card system like we have for phone providers, but as a generic means to pay for online services with cash.
I stopped buying Samsung after two phones. About 18 months or so after I got them, some update would make things so slow I needed a new phone. Second time I figured it wasn't the phone being old, it was the update slowing it on purpose.
Other phones I've had don't seem to have this problem, updates seem to not change the speed of the UI at all. But I also don't appreciate the customised Android, there doesn't ever seem to be a benefit.
My Note 8 is going on a lot of cycles. Have had it for too long probably. Battery still holds up solid.
Older device, Note 5 had a 5 percent warning. Battery went to crap quickly.
Avoiding the fast charge helps too. I use it when I need to and just go normal otherwise when I am not time constrained.
No charging port trouble. Wireless charging just works.
Recently, I got a battery back. Doing it now before I really need it. So far, a year in and a lot more plug in charging and I cannot recommend one more highly.
I find I can often run the phone off the back and pretty much never have to allow a deeper discharge.
Battery time leveled off and is in a very, very slow decline.
YMMV, of course.
Doing so would be comitting the cardinal sin of "leaving money on the table".
The only way to deal with this is to accept that the only calculus these companies make is a calculus of tradeoffs.
Then make sure that the tradeoffs are correct.
Do they collect and monetize data beyond those ads? Not that I've heard of.
does apple make money off your private data now or will it ever try to do so in the future?
I think, nowadays and given the trend, it is safe to assume that all closed and networked devices already do that: phones and tablets, closed software and hardware subsystems in computers, SmartTVs, personal assistants, cars, household appliances, etc.
Unfortunately, i find it hard in this day and age to find a hardware manufacturer that's not abusive. Do you know of a hardware manufacturer that has a reasonable warranty policy, makes it easy to repair the hardware (no screws or standard screws, definitely no glue), publishes datasheets (specs) and does not lock the bootloader?
I think when it comes to mobile phones, Fairphone Librem and Pinephone are the only three that get close, but none of them checks all the boxes. I'm all ears for suggestions, whether it's for phones, networking equipment, or whatever.
System76 and Framework seem to have this reputation. I've yet to buy from them, but they're on my list of potential vendors.
Fairphone, Librem, and Pine, similarly.
I'd look to Louis Rossman for reviews and recommendations.
- I've owned and/or used Thinkpad laptops for over 20 years. Occasional others, including MacBook Air and Dell. Old-school ThinkPad is damned hard to beat.
- In the phone space there's virtually nothing that appeals, with much of that being the technology, carriers, and practice. If I have to carry one ... I probably won't anyway.
- Android is a disaster on numerous fronts. The fact that it's also the best contender running (PinePhone / Librem, please up your game* is ... well, it just is. Based on over a decade of use and multiple devices.
So yes relative to the current market, my expectations are high. But in absolute, and if you forget about all the crapware we've been fed in the past two decades, does that sound actually unreasonable?
PS: it appears iOS does plenty of background data collection too https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28741262
I don't. I want my phone to be reliable and receive updates for a long time. I have no intention of taking it apart and I think that is the case for most people.
If more glue makes the phone more resistant to water damage or breakage when I drop it then that is better for me.
The only way to ensure that if to publish the complete datasheets so that operating systems can maintain drivers. You cannot rely on a hardware manufacturer to provide updates, as it could go out of business any day.
> If more glue makes the phone more resistant to water damage or breakage when I drop it then that is better for me.
There's plenty of hardware design techniques (disclaimer: not my field) you can use for structural integrity and you don't need glue. Even if you don't have intention to take it apart, if it's glued it probably means that it will be really hard to replace the battery when it dies after 2-5 years.
If you want durable hardware, you need hardware that you (or a skilled shopperson) can take apart and where you can replace individual parts. That's why cars can 100% be taken down and why electronics in cars (over 100 microprocessors in an average car?!) are a worrying development for maintainability/durability.
EVGA has had even better warranties in the past but still have a decent one and I have always had good experiences with their customer service.
I have an LG dishwasher, and it has a service manual inside the housing and I can and have bought parts online.
Consumer reports has data about reliability of various household goods and appliances.
IFixit is a good source to check before you buy a cellphone and other various things.
They control your phone, you don't. On some older Galaxy phones, you could at least unlock the bootloader and install LineageOS (which is much faster due to not running all this malware) but apparently it's not supported on S7. Samsung is slowly becoming the new Apple where you can't remove your battery without a screwdriver and there's a "Knox" security where if you lose your password (or somebody donates a phone without donating the password) the hardware will go straight to the (non-)recycling bin.
Is buying a PinePhone the only option to get decent hardware without lock-in for under 300€?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25074959
I think we can agree this perfectly fits the definition of "spyware"? There's probably countless other examples i'm unaware of, and to be fair Apple is certainly not the only actor engaging in such outrageous behavior (Microsoft is another, perhaps more famous one).
EDIT: It appears there's studies of iOS data collection and it's really scary. Previous discussion here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28741262
Sadly we have been made believe that it could be much cheaper, but there are hidden human, privacy and environmental costs.
Hopefully we finally start paying the actual cost for our smartphones, and our planet, the kids and our privacy will be grateful for it.
That will also stop the updates, and it gives you an option to uninstall all updates when you disable it.
Also, since those apps are usually on the system partition, if you did have a way of removing them that space still isn't as useful as the rest of the space on your phone (not read/write except when updating/installing).
like which?
you can either buy an over-priced apple iToy, inferior samsung clone, or some chinese android with buggy bloated software
I stopped buying Sony back in the late 90s when all the DVD copy protection started. Then they added Cinavia, and so on. I don't agree with piracy, but I certainly don't agree with being told how I can use something I've purchased.
And just yesterday there's the story about Dymo crippling their label printers if it does detect... RFID in their own paper.
It's going to get worse.
The industry is heavily monopolized, and the regulations are outdated.
Doesn't seems like I have much choice.
I have been thinking for some time, what does it take for a third Mobile OS platform. While there are millions of Apps, The absolute essential Apps on smartphone seems to have concentrated to less than a hundred?
Misread something, one of us.
That or the TV companies are intentionally making previous TVs slower with updates they know old TVs can't run with any modicum of speed.
This is what happened to the Nexus 7 tablets, I owned one and the experience, which was great at first, became terrible over time.
Smart TVs are a mistake, unfortunately most (maybe all current productions) are smart TVs nowadays. TVs are something that can last a long while - I kept my old dumb TV for 10 years before the backlight became too dark for my liking -, smart components on the other hand.. plus, it's not like it's a huge inconvenience or extra expense to add something like a chromecast or fire tv to get literally the same experience the smart components provide, except that this time, if the stick dies, you don't have to replace the whole tv.
I’ve tried giving them second chances after they turned me off after the first set of tv spying the did. They opening lied about it saying they don’t inject ads or tracking or monitor what you watch. This was back when they put ads into content people watched on Plex.
Unfortunately LG is going the same way too.
I may be old school but I don't think its wrong of me to expect at least a decade out of an appliance, especially when you go mid-tier or higher. Samsung is priced at mid-tier or higher, where is the commensurate reliability?
They do make good SSDs though, I'll give them that.
My question is about their phones - what info do we have on Samsung's spying vs Google or others? I won't touch anything Chinese made for the same reason, but worse. Fairphone doesn't seem to be usable in the US.
The prior ones, and this one up until about 18 months ago, were only used as displays for my cable TV box, DVD player, Blu-ray player, game consoles, and streaming boxes. I then cancelled cable and hooked up an antenna to watch actual TV broadcasts on it thus actually using it as a television instead of just a monitor.
It's terrible at that. First, it doesn't have a good way to quickly check the signal strength of multiple channels, so it is awkward and tedious to deal with setting up channels where you need careful antenna positioning to receive them.
Second, when you bring up the channel guide it continues to show the current channel you were watching in a picture-in-picture (PIP) inset. This is good so you can check the guide without interrupting what you are watching. However, if any of the channels listed in the visible part of the guide do not have a good signal the PIP inset freezes for 5-10 seconds while it apparently tries to get information about those channels. You only get the uninterrupted PIP is all the channels on the guide are giving good signals. I've got some that vary depending on weather and atmospheric conditions, and I've got some that I need to change antenna aim to get, and these are scattered throughout the guide so I tend to get the interruption on every page of the guide.
Third, there doesn't seem to be any way to delete a channel. Some of those weak channels causing some of the problems mentioned above were channels I don't care about, but happened to be strong enough when I did the channel setup scan that it added them. Nor is there a way to explicitly add a channel, although I think that if you manually direct it to a channel that it has not auto programmed and it finds a good signal, and you repeatedly do this, it might add it.
I know that's not the point of the post, and I'm not blaming the author. It just seems like such a ridiculous concept in the first place. My old flip phone had its own problems, and there wasn't even a display along the seam.
Like even if you really wanted screen that went down to a smaller size, why not do something scroll-inspired, rather than book-inspired?
Give it a couple of revisions and you'll see products that you actually want to buy.
Compare those pen based tablets that Bill Gates was demoing in IIRC 2002 to the first ipad.
This is in fact completely backward: a continuous deformable surface has all the problems of two exactly adjacent but discontinuous surfaces, with the additional problem of providing relief for the fold.
Apple has developed it's own silicon and the chips powering iPhones, iPads and Macs are now the same. They come up with new and interesting manufacturing processes, or supply chain management. Their phones have lidar now. But you know what I've hear for years even from developer friends? "Apple can no longer innovate."
Samsung comes up with a folding screen of dubious quality or changes the shape of the phone and people love it. Internally it's just another Qualcomm or Exynos or whatever. But then what isn't besides Apple? Seems reasonable to try and carve out their segment of the Android market and I think they are largely successful. I know people who will specifically buy Samsung even when you can get similar specced phones for cheaper.
You could consider getting new friends who are more intelligent. Some people are being fooled by the fact that a rectangle shape is staying consistent year after year, a very surface attribute. Apple does deep work. People who think only the surface matters are missing the story.
For some reason Google does not seem to fit, possibly because of Xoogler anecdotes I've read here. GitHub seems close but maybe too scattered in many directions (for example, they seem to have some new huge feature in beta every other week). Airbnb does deep work from what I've seen (I attended an internal hackathon once). I wonder if that's not one of the strengths of YC and YC-picks, inherently...
Like, a lot of people? I don't know anyone who's even been intrigued enough to buy it, and an overwhelming majority of feedback I hear online is negative.
Reviews indicate that when even fully open there's a slight bend you can feel when you're using the touchscreen.
But really, we should just look at Microsoft's Duo and see the reality of a two screen device.
Maybe they could sell big roles of perforated phones, so you can just tear a new phone off the end each time you need one, like toilet paper.
The story of getting it fixed is really why people love Apple and even Amazon.
I've had the Wifi go unreliable on an iPad. I got a Genius appointment for later that day. They confirmed the Wifi module was shot and just gave me a new device on the spot. They even offered to do the transfer for me. This sort of convenience is what gives people confidence in buying Apple products.
Even something as simple as accessory access matters. If my Macbook charger dies, I can walk into any number of stores and buy another. Dell charger? Not so much.
Amazon has pretty accurate shipping estimates. This matters. So does Apple for the record. Just last week I got sent the wrong product. I didn't have to talk to anyone on the phone. I simply went to my order on my phone and clicked "return item" -> "wrong product" and the entire matter was dealt with.
I don't want to deal with support that is deliberately hard to contact that is monetarily motivated to not do anything for you.
It's not up to a customer to decide whether a product is "technically" feasible. Lots of things that "seem" impossible or unreasonable are usable and practical, e.g. compact high wattage laptop chargers compared to the absolute _units_ we used to get and still get on cheaper laptop models. The blame here is squarely on samsung; They decided that this product was fit for sale and as a result need to support it, whether or not people who buy it are "kinda crazy"
It's really one of those anecdotal experiences. I used Samsung devices exclusively because they have RMA offices all around SEA region. On the other hand Apple's iCare in my current town has 2.2 stars on google reviews which I didn't know was even possible. When my work iPhone's battery died I decided to drop 70$ from my own pocket rather than deal with iCare - that's how bad it was.
All I'm saying that warranty service anecdotes are just that - anecdotes, and your milage might vary.
And how long does that take? Do you need to speak to Samsung support on the phone to get an RMA number? How easy is that? That seems to be the process according to Google. What have you had to get repaired this way? What was the process?
> On the other hand Apple's iCare in my current town has 2.2 stars on google reviews
First, what is iCare? Do you mean an Apple Store? Are you referring to AppleCare? Or something third party? I'm genuinely curious: which store? Can you point to it specifically?
> When my work iPhone's battery died I decided to drop 70$ from my own pocket rather than deal with iCare - that's how bad it was.
This story doesn't really pass the smell test to me. Who is dropping money to fix a work phone rather than having work deal with it? Was this out of pocket or expensed?
My own experience with android manufacturers' service center in SEA is you simply come in to their store, hand over the device, and get a quote later via email (if the damage is not covered by warranty). Direct device replacement on the spot is very rare, never even see it happening myself.
I think Google might be more of the same, but I just don’t have enough experience with the company.
I’ve heard horror stories from Microsoft when it comes to hardware.
> I've had the Wifi go unreliable on an iPad. I got a Genius appointment for later that day. They confirmed the Wifi module was shot and just gave me a new device on the spot. They even offered to do the transfer for me. This sort of convenience is what gives people confidence in buying Apple products.
I'm still using Apple hardware myself, but I daresay that if Apple corporate decides not to admit fault and fix something, users will be SOL too.
Apple has never admitted fault for their shoddy MagSafe charger cable insulation, which always end up disintegrating and spewing blue stuff all over my furniture.
I've had multiple cables flake over the years, and every time I bring the the charger to a Genius bar (so far: Australia, Japan, and Singapore), they've always fallen back to "policy" and blamed it on me for not taking care of it properly.
And no, I didn't get a new Magsafe 2 charger or MacBook Pro on the spot.
I honestly don't know how Apple cables can be this bad. More to the point, I don't understand how Apple leadership can tolerate this from a PR perspective.
Please don't use abbreviations unless absolutely necessary. Letters are free on Hacker News.
https://www.ifixit.com/Device/AirPods ... 0/10 is a statement.
https://www.inputmag.com/culture/apples-repair-policies-are-...
> It fixes your problem, but I wouldn't exactly call that fixing the phone.
What kind of copium is this? Devices break. Even the most reliable devices just break less. What matters to the customer is how that is resolved. The customer wants a working device. Period.
Would this be somehow better if Apple sent the device off for fixing and I'd get it back in 3 weeks (maybe)?
Yes, the (lack of) repairability is a problem, but it's separate.
What's more, we can expect Apple at least attempts to refurbish some devices. Even if it's just for parts. That's more than what Samsung did in the original article.
Not sure how Genius Bar support has evolved but I remember my little brother got an original iPad when it came out. Well kid took it to school, and someone kicked his backpack with the iPad inside and the screen got smashed. We took it to Apple and I remember the rep saying something along the lines of "we understand this was your fault, but we'll replace it anyways". Apple clearly is thinking about the long game, the price to replace an iPad pales in comparison to what that customer will spend on your products if you treat them right.
I quit Apple then & there-- previously I had used apple laptops, iPods, iPhones, iPads since they had first been released, but decided I wouldn't pay their premium anymore if I wasn't going to get premium service.
About two years later I got a small settlement from a class action brought against Apple over their use of faulty moisture sensors. Not enough to cover repair cost, though I didn't get it repaired, I switched to Android.
Fwiw I had the exact same experience replacing my Galaxy screen at a general repair store. Same day.
Everything now runs on usb-c, Apple included, with the ridiculous exception of iPhones.
I’m sure someone in these companies has made a spreadsheet that shows permissive repair and replacement policies cost $X million a year, but it probably doesn’t take into account that the experience with the iPod directly led to me purchasing multiple iPhones and Macs.
I am still buying Apple products. So jokes on me.
Oh, so, fraud.
Retail is hard. Perhaps less hard for Apple, but I wonder to what extent the retail store employees end up paying for stuff like this.
I was in lawn and garden during springtime. People would come in and buy a fully loaded top of the line lawn tractor. A week later it would be back, covered in mud and grass clippings, clearly having been through hell. Inevitably they were not happy with it. Probably because their pasture was now mowed.
I moved to electronics in the winter. Same story around the Super Bowl but this time big screen TVs.
It was easy to tell. Customers who just went straight to the big ticket item without any questions were obviously not interested in a long term purchase. But we just ate it.
The shitty thing was I got paid commission. Those returns got clawed back in my next paycheck.
I think Apple at least has the decency to pay their retail employees hourly.
You're not alone. A lot of people will invest a lot of time into lying, playing dumb, making threats (think people with a lot of Twitter followers threatening to broadcast how terrible your company is unless you give them exactly what they want) and other manipulative tactics to abuse warranty claims.
Ultimately this is why we had to become more strict about warranty claims. When half of your warranty claims are coming from people angling for free upgrades or demanding full-price refunds after many years of service (some of whom tried to demand to keep the hardware and get a refund), you quickly become numb to it. I guess companies like Apple can absorb the lies for a while, but eventually you have to make a choice between padding your margins to cater to the warranty abusers or becoming more strict on warranty claims.
Costco, Nordstrom, Marine Layer, etc.
To me this is a winning strategy. Even if it’s 1 in 5 or less.
It was annoying, but we did bill samsung for all the work. :)
The blogs author might also like the fact that samsung owns their warranty repair infrastructure, they don't contract it out. So less repairs means more profit. While contractors repair everything that is not obviously deliberate.
In earlier iPhone generations, they would replace your EarPod headphones without a hassle (or wait). Later on (as Apple got more popular and Apple store genius bar lines grew longer), you had to make a reservation and they would only consider replacing it after checking the cable's (discrete) serial number.
It’s so hard to step out the Apple ecosystem when these other manufacturers have consistently screwed me over with repairs.
I’m specifically calling out Dell, Samsung and LG here. All were utterly terrible experiences.
Dell was the absolute worst though. They sold me a $1,700+ XPS notebook that months later had a non-functional trackpad, and they refused to do anything to rectify the situation. With an investment that large I need certainty that I can get support, and thus far Apple is the only PC OEM that has provided that.
If anyone can suggest non-Apple OEMs that at least provide a competitive support experience, I’m all ears.
Framework shipped their first product in 2021. Let's give them a bit before comparing them to an extremely matured product from one of the richest companies ever. If they survive long enough to make a version 5.0, it'll probably still be worse than the MacBook due to the lower level of integration, but modularity is a definite perk.
Edit: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/07/frameworks-new-light...
Actually the CPU looks decent.
Or
“Other than that, how was the play Ms. Lincoln”
Have you ever thought Apple got to be the richest company in the world from almost being bankrupt a little over 20 years ago by not shipping sub par hardware?
Well there were the butterfly keyboards…
You don’t care when a laptop sounds like a 747 when you are working under load?
I haven't unplugged my Macbook Pro more than a couple times in the last 2 years.
In short, I'd take a two inch thick Clevo that sounds like a 747 and only lasts for 2 hours if it meant not having to worry about turning my HVAC on when I want to do a screenshare.
If I wanted to tinker, I'd buy a Raspbery PI. I want to get work done while giving as little thought as possible to the hardware I'm using to facilitate the work.
If speed and downtime and hands-off are the most important features that trump all others, then this whole post about the cost of a bad warranty policy wasn't for you in the first place.
You don't have time for warrantys!
You just pull out the spare laptop you got at the same time as the one that broke, or your old one wich is only 1 year old and still more than good enough to work on while the new one is down. Or you just immediately go down to Staples or BestBuy or Microcenter and buy a new one.
Apple is not a magic better option where you can have your cake and eat it too. They routinely deny warranty or even reasonable paid repair for things they shipped defective. I have several unfortunate friends with laptops and all-in-ones over the years with dead video cards that Apple refused to repair, and they are not self repairable because even for the desktop model the video card is non-standard so you can't just replace it, and thanks to Apple's unique actions wrt getting the government to seize things at the border, no one else is even allowed to make a replacement either. And those keyboards...they stopped making them, yet did they ever make good on all those people they sold those models to? Apple routinely, routinely, absolutely screws over people who believed the marketing about how great the support is. That high premium you pay for the device goes to sending high paid lawyers to every small town to make sure they win in court against petty warranty suits from ordinary individuals.
They spend $10k just make sure that a warranty for a $50 part does not win in court. That is not better than the article's terrible Samsung experience.
It's not that I don't like to tinker, I love tinkering with things. But things like my primary phone or primary computer I need to "just work", and I need them to work all the time with minimal downtime.
At least for me, Apple's selling point of "just let us take care of it" is very appealing, I'm already dealing with a ton of things every day, I don't need to add "fixing my phone" to that list.
It's never been more complicated than the normal:
1) "make sure your BIOS is upto date" hogwash, which I troubleshoot prior.
2) Acknowledge it's a hardware issue
3) Get a field tech to call me
4) Wait a day or two at most for parts, if not the same day
5) Tech comes out and replaces any parts at my place of work or home
6) Fixed
And this has been over years and years with Precision and XPS laptops.
We really have no consumer protections in the US anymore.
How is that not covered by the standard, mandated 1-year warranty? Did they pull the same BS described in the article?
Apple is no saint for this kind of stuff either though, I still remember the red humidity marker in the headphone jack that denied repairs to many people because of “water damage” (which was actually just sweat, probably)
Nobody else I know of stands behind their laptops like that. If a company by default bets money on their own products then that's reassuring. Is the product any good? Prove it, like Dell.
Not that XPS laptops don't fail, cause they do, but at least it's rare enough that Dell is willing to spend large amounts on on-site next business day repair.
Here in Norway it used to be (at least with HP) that if you bought the professional line you'd get professional service.
I had a personal nc6320 bought some 17 years ago and they would literally come to my desk and replace the monitor free of charge. (No, I didn't have a paid support plan, this was included in the purchase price and I had bought it myself, not through a company.)
Around the same time, trying to get a consumer grade HP repaired was just painful.
I was totally surprised when I called them and they asked me to call business support and business support just asked where they could find me and when I wanted them to be there. I can't remember a single clue pointing in this direction before I called customer support for home computers.
(Then again: I should stop getting surprised by companies that waste fantastic marketing opportunities.)
I was told they they should normally be able to do this replacement, but they didn't have replacement batteries available. After mentioning I could just leave the device with them until the stock became available, they went off into the back for a few minutes.
When they returned, they said they would accept my years old Macbook as a return for its original purchase price and I walked out with a brand new Macbook Pro essentially for the cost of the tax.
I cannot imagine getting this service from any other computer vendor.
We generally call this "being an early adopter."
Better to wait for it to mature first in newer versions than to jump into the hype squad and leave disappointed.
But the model number mentioned in the post resolves to "Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G" which sounds not "first edition"? According to wikipedia samsung's first foldable phone came out in 2019.
Now the first Apple Watch…
> There you go. Never buy the first edition of a new product innovation or technology.
I'm fully vaccinated but this was my biggest concern. mRNA tech is still in the first-edition of large-scale deloyment.I'm not even sure "looking cool" was a factor in some of the worst ones. "Winning industrial design awards for being thinner than possible" stands out to me. In pursuit of that, they had four years worth of laptop keyboards that didn't work long term, and got rid of the most amazing feature ever for laptop charging (MagSafe), to thin things out further with USB-C. Not a bad connector, but definitely a bad charging connector compared to MagSafe for people with kids, pets, etc.
I'm glad they've gone back to a laptop that seems to work, but... I've lost interest.
Was it the Apple // era, Macs, iPods, iPhones, iPads, Watches, AirPods, etc?
What feature phone in 2021 has anything that a modern consumer would find acceptable?
I’ve had Androïd for a decade after Apple forced an update to the iPhone 3G that made it so slow you couldn’t even dial a number anymore.
But a couple years ago, I bought a used iPhone 6s because I got tired of the Androïd flakiness and lack of quality in general. All my trust in google also eroded over time.
I don’t regret jumping ships again. The iPhone works well, I can still block all ads (except in the YouTube app) using nextdns.io, my 6 years old iPhone still gets updates and runs well. The only thing I miss is newpipe but the trade off was worth it.
The 50$ China androids you mention are riddled with spyware and provide few or no updates once the phone has been released. Then you have to deal with alternative roms if they exist which means you’re spending more time making your phone work that actually being able to use it normally.
Not saying it can appeal to some but it’s not for everyone if you want something that just works and is affordable.
I paid 200$ for my used iPhone 2 years ago and I’m keeping it until they stop proving iOS updates AND then new features in the new iOS would actually be useful to me.
I replaced the battery myself last year (cost 10$ + the ifixit tool set for 70$ which I’ve used many times to fix other things). It’s not quite 50$ but it’s not 1000$ either.
Edit: not talking about MacBooks. This is a completely different story with brain dead decisions to look good even if it fails constantly (their shitty keyboards of the last 4–5 years) or refusing to even acknowledge let alone fix serious issues (like that MacBook with the gpu desoldering itself and failing in groves while apple was saying lalalalala and ignoring the problem for YEARS. I won’t ever buy a MacBook, they’re not good value and I don’t trust Apple to make good decisions about them or own up their mistakes with them. Plus they cost multiples more than a decent used laptop or workstation on which you can run Linux and upgrade components whenever needed so it can last you 5–10 years.
No one owes you anything. Furthermore all applicable warranties are communicated at time of purchase.
Bottom line, if the risk adjusted return is not worth it, then don't buy it. You may not be an early adopter
i.e. the reversed burden of proof during the first 6 months, where it is assumed the device is at fault, and they supplier has to prove it is not.
So in this case I'd agree, I see little proof just an assertion, and would suggest they institute the process for their equivalent of a Small Claims Court case.
This is in the EU, where manufacturers are required to provide a two year guarantee [0], which can't be voluntarily opted out of.
[0] https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/gua...
Well yeah. Buying something early is the most expensive time to buy it. The inefficiencies haven't been worked out of the manufacturing process yet, and there's not an established wide customer base to spread the R&D over yet.
Radios in the 1920s cost over 100 hours of wages for a lot of people. TVs in the 50s were stupid expensive. Computers in the early 60s were literally hundreds of thousands of dollars. And all of these things were pretty garbage compared to what you think of today. Hell, the computer from the early 60s could probably lose a math race to a seasoned abacus veteran.
In exchange for the high risk and high payment, you get to play with something that might be cool, and you get bragging rights (depending on your personality type, one of these might excite you more than the other).
> Any decent company would fix it, full stop.
Well, probably. I'm not going to defend samsung here. They're acting pretty garbage.
But the point about new tech being risky, is entirely fair. If something's still exciting, it's probably a good idea for the risk-averse to avoid it.
How is this remotely like the life changing effect of getting a radio or tv?
The point was that it was all 4 together of: expensive, immature, unsupported, and not sold as unsupported.
It was sold with a standard warranty like any product, yet in reality they just deny the claim no matter how valid.
The expense only means that's why you care, that they take your money which did not break on them a few weeks later, and don't honor their promises.
I try to get gen 2 or later after a new revision.
I made an exception with my current car because all the electronics are new which to be frank are probably the biggest risk, but Isuzu engines, drive trains and gear boxes have barely changed in 10+ years. And they're the parts I'm more worried about and the 6 year warranty covers everything else.
But as you said, the same reliability can never be expected in consumables like computers, phones and the like.
Seems like you're saying a person who bought a thousand euro phone and couldn't get it repaired under warranty after a month of mild use is "risk-averse" if they dislike that experience.
Would a truly non-risk-averse person be overjoyed by this experience or see no problem with it? Would they accept it as the price they pay for being an early adopter and see no reason to complain? I'm confused.
I'm saying that a person who is risk-averse should probably avoid this. There aren't very many third party repair places yet, so you're completely at the mercy of a single company.
There's also an increased risk if said company is based outside your country (or supra-national political union, should you live in one). It's harder for a country to force a company in another jurisdiction into compliance.
Yes, I think vendors should not have put this out on the market, but it seems people were very happy to pay for such a gimmick.
To me it was obvious this was a giant failure point. It's not risky when you know it's going to fail. Maybe a tradeoff is a better name for it.
> As with any new technology it takes time to iron out early problems. Things break, need to be fixed, improved etc. That’s all fine! I wasn’t angry when the phone broke, I was angry when it wasn’t repaired.
That the phone might break is inherent in the fact that it's a new technology. The question is who pays for it when it does, the customer or the manufacturer.
I was an early adopter of a Chumby (damn I loved that thing). The risk I took was that they would go out of business and no longer support the eco system - that risk proved real.
I can accept taking a risk and it not working out, this is taking one risk and having the company try and pin other risks on you.
Blaming the customer for your weak ass product is not the early-adopter risk, its the caveat emptor / screw you risk. I reject the idea that early adopter means accepting bad quality.
I recently had an issue with my car (A volvo for what it matters) with some painted plastic pealing. It was the first model year, I wasn't surprised, things need to get worked out...the early adopter risk is from them working things out. I took it in and they initially rejected the warranty claim and blamed me. I offered to have a paint chemist friend look at it and do an analysis - that changed their tune quickly. The early adopter risk I took was to my time that there might be some manufacturing quirks...not to them being sleazy about standing by their products.
This site truly has to be experienced to be fully appreciated. Try to find a part for one of their appliances (like a latch or hose or something). Here’s a list of some of their model numbers:
https://www.whirlpoolparts.com/PartSearch/ProductBrandAllMod...
You may be wondering why I needed to order replacement parts for one of their appliances during initial installation. Let’s just say I’m not buying any of their crap again either.
If that’s not bad enough to scare you off, their fridges have cameras that use deep learning to translate video into marketing info, then phone it home (joining it with information from local samsung tvs if possible).
They can't design a dishwasher that doesn't die within a year. At least Best Buy honored the warranties on them - twice.
“ LPT: If you live in California, manufacturers of most household electronic goods that sell for more than $100 have to provide spare parts for up to seven years, regardless of warranty status. If they can't make the parts available to you, they have to buy the product back from you.”
https://www.reddit.com/r/LifeProTips/comments/p9nz0l/lpt_if_...
(Sorry, I hate linking to Reddit web interface)
I have two theories.
1) Ignorance.
Samsung's fridge team had never seen a fridge before. Certainly had never used or owned their own fridges.
2) Spite.
Samsung's fridge team harbored a deep visceral hatred of all things fridge related. They despise each and everyone of their customers on a personal basis. They hate their occupation, their employer, each other, and themselves and work overtime to covertly sabotage all work products.
Model numbers for white goods tend to be "encoded", almost like a VIN; this isn't a Samsung-specific thing.
At least the number of bits of info you can encore with the appliance VIN like scheme is meaningful.
It's still all sold as a Chevrolet Camaro and the vast majority of parts are shared - they all use e.g. the same glass, ventilation plastic, ignition switch, etc. When you do need something option specific, such as spark plugs, you do identify your vehicle by VIN.
From my experience fixing appliances, the things that break (button mounting plates, the plastic door frame, that horrible hose coming down from the pump on otherwise excellent Bosch models) is very very commonly shared across models that look the same on the outside.
Maybe it’s like the mattress industry: a scam so that you can’t compare or price match the same model at different retails because “it’s not the same model number”.
Exact same thing, just a different model number.
...but they're the only ones selling that exact model.
here, we have an EU law that says that anything bought online can be returned in 14 days no questions asked. also, the warranty is for 2 years minimum.
yeah, i know it’s a socialist law, but you can bet anything on the fact that corporations will get out of their way to increase their profit. maybe caring for people should be more important.
I recommend Apple phones to everyone in my family for the specific reason that if you have a broken Apple device, you can walk into an Apple store and get it fixed.
My mom is starting some kind of personal vendetta because her 13 month Ipad just stopped functioning. The Apple store told her it's 'fried' and she needs to just buy a new one.
It sounds like it is defective.
There's also plenty of ways to damage a device. You could plug it into a damaged, cheap USB charger.
Can't be an alpha or beta tester for a multibillion dollar corp if you're the second owner, and already have heard any and all gripes about a model.
Funny how nobody has time for that, but plenty of time to
1) be without a device
2) complain
etc
Also, a bad USB charger should not kill a device.
> Also, a bad USB charger should not kill a device.
Then you've not seen bad USB chargers. Of course a device that by design is pumping voltage could ruin whatever it is connected to - especially if the connected device is sensitive equipment.I've seen a USB charger pumping -1 to 11 volts AC out the USB connector - it was fluctuating 6 volts in either direction. Of course, you need an oscolliscope to detect that as it's at 50 hertz (C plug) - on a regular voltmeter it looked like 5 v steady.
A question to the lawmakers.
I've honestly never had a TV just randomly die on me before, which is why I never buy the extended warranties. But Vizio not selling parts for expensive TVs just doesn't sit well with me, hence the "never again".
I still remember when I bought it, I was choosing between it and a TCL. When I asked what the difference was, the guy banged on the back really hard of each. The TCL showed big white splotches when hit, the LG had no effect. He called it 'shielding', but I'm not versed enough to know if that's a thing.
Maybe not available through "Them", but "their" prices are usually atrocious.
The touchscreen started losing sensitivity on the edges (curved glass) after 13 months. The store made a bad decision carrying that phone model. They fixed/replaced it.
The UK has 6 (or 5 depending on part) years statutory consumer protection, and so didn't have to change anything when the EU brought in the 2 year period. I believe Ireland was in a similar position at the time.
We did end up changing stuff for the initial 6 month 'reversed burden of proof' protection
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9223197
The top comment in above is "Apple customer service is hell" :-)
My Samsung Galaxy Note9 literally had a firmware update go out that, looking on Samsung's forums, caused calls to drop like flies completely at random. Once you updated to that firmware, there's no going back and no hardware replacement will fix the issue. There is absolutely no fix months later, no acknowledgement there is an issue, and no fix of any kind. We had to get an iPhone because you can't run a business when you are apologizing over email daily for a missed call.
Not saying Apple is great - but Samsung has objectively worse problems.
Edit: And it's not just their phones. My experience with their appliances is unbelievably cursed. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30424010
Multiple hours' drive to the nearest apple store, so they offer no timeline advantage for me
Maybe I'm lucky and have a terribly weird experience with hardware. But every person I personally know who uses Apple hardware has been to their store to fix/replace it at some point. Apple is definitely doing a good job with servicing, because those people are also happy this is a possibility, but... having to do it at all feels weird to me. (anecdata of course)
There was zero failure associated with ports, keyboard, trackpad, or board. Mind you, each machine went through thousands of dock / undock cycle. Even batteries were holding strong charge after 5 years. These were work laptops and I didn't baby them at all.
With that said, I wouldn't a buy cheapo Lenovo ($500) because it did fail on me completely. Dead.
That's it.
x230 - replacement battery, screen died (easy replacement), handrest cracked, still usable
T460p - 5 years of light use, nothing
T470p - 3 years, nothing
Legion Y520 - keyboard stopped working partly, bought a replacement and noticed it's basically impossible to replace, then bought a second one, this time a complete top case - replacement was a chore, but fine
Overall: still a happy Lenovo customer
I suppose some people have been unlucky with Apple hardware but it's maybe also due to the perceptions and that seemingly everyone (at least in IT and development) is using a Mac these days.
It's better now, but not better than others or even worth mentioning. If anything, I feel people now are familiar with Apples help because their stuff keep breaking. Like the prev gen MBP I had was a mess, only computer I've ever had to repair. And even multiple times.
In Norway (and most of EU I guess?) there's laws that goes beyond warranty. So for the first half year, they really have to prove you did something out of the ordinary to break your product. Apple is notorious for saying some sensor is triggered and therefore you misused the phone. But those sensors can triggered from using the phone in normal winter conditions..
(And then for the next 4.5 years the burden of proof isn't that strong, but they still have to fix or replace broken devices, not however long a producer's warranty claims)
Cynical me says that Samsung is seeing above average warranty claims on these foldable phones. Thus they need to get them down so some manager somewhere decides that they will enforce the policies more strictly with small scratches and dents outright disqualifying claims. Lo and behold this reduces the warranty claims paid out but in the grand scheme of things completely demolishes any customer loyalty.
I wonder if author reached out via twitter or some other social media channel to have Samsung comment.
Also I have to think what Apple or Google would do. I'm pretty sure Apple would just straight up repair the phone with very few questions (that has been my experience). Google you'd have to go through a longer warranty process but my guess is they'd be more lenient and eventually you'd get a new or repaired phone.
Samsung is losing hard here.
Somebody was told to invent a new type of phone, something that will "wow" people. That's the flip phone.
Somebody was told that the warranty claims were coming in too fast, and need to be reduced.
Same reason people at Google keep launching new products. It doesn't make Google look good, it doesn't achieve Google's goals, it makes L5s promotable to L6s.
The goal becomes less about doing things that benefit customers, and more about doing things that benefit the organization.
It's sad but I've accepted that this is how most companies are today.
One way to avoid getting burned is to only buy what you actually need when you actually need it.
You were lucky, the reality is that sometimes Apple pretens an issue does not exist and only after a big action lawsuit is started they suddenly they become generous and offer to fix the problem. So the first people that had a bad experience before the lawsuits are in much smaller number and their experience is crushed by the rest that praise Apple for the generosity of fixing their mistakes after they are forced by external stuff.
This is legally guaranteed, that within the first 6 months any defects are assumed to have existed at the time of delivery [0]. If samsung don't respect the warranty, issue a chargeback. Your bank will back you up and Samsung have no leg to stand on.
(Also, samsung really shouldn't be playing silly-buggers here, but I guess enough people capitulate, that it makes sense for them to do this.)
[0] https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/gua....
I don't think "chargebacks" are that easy? It's purely a thing that credit cards do, but nothing else AFAIK.
But yes, this falls well within warranty. Samsung needs to prove the damage is caused by the consumer, and this is clearly not it.
Whether it's worth the time and headaches getting your right is a different matter.
Consumers need more rights when it comes to termination of services that are borderline essential.
> Released 2019, October 22
How is a 2 year old phone aging?
The one I managed to get repaired under warranty (Nexus 5 bootlooping death) lasted 1 week before dying the exact same way again. It look 2 weeks just to get it repaired.
I switched to iPhone. I can’t remember what number even though I’m typing on it because it doesn’t matter. It works as well today as the day I bought it. (Although I do miss Google’s keyboard)
I doubt I'll ever buy an iPhone brand new (I go out of my way not to support the CCP) but until Pinephone and linux becomes a usable mobile OS I'll stick with the XS until it either dies or Apple stop supporting it in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_iOS_and_iPadOS_devices
4 years or so? The iphone 6s was released in 2015 and it's still getting support, that's incredible.
Good thing I only spend 200€ every two years on the latest trustworthy moto g. Clean google experience, no bloatware, nice gesture actions.
A 1k€ phone would have to last 10 years to give comparable value, and I doubt it exists since battery and flash memory tech is the same no matter the price.
Yeah it shows that it is old. The battery and performance is worse than before, but it still lasts the day as I am not using it that hard. I have no legitimate _need_ to upgrade as it stands today.
I guess the frequency of upgrades quite heavily on usage, but I find upgrading every 2 years to be very often.
Edit to add: replaced a slim silicone cover once or twice, hardened glass screen protector 3 or 4 times.
My phone right now is a Fairphone 4, with replaceable battery (and the rest too!).
It'll come with a 5-year warranty and software updates, but the big question is of course if hardware specs will be good enough in 5 years.
+ the shitshow called Galaxy Store that you mandatory have to visit if you care about security updates always greets me with a dialog that suggests to install some game _and_ I have to opt-out for _every_ game. I don't know any real world example were you can be forced to watch an ad before something broken gets fixed. That only works in the (virt.) environment of a quasi monopoly.
Samsung have removed the Elpis controller from the 980 PRO SSD and replaced it with an unknown one, and also removed any speed reference from the spec sheet.
Take a look here for what's changed on the 980 PRO: https://i.imgur.com/YJShyLR.jpg
Come on, seriously? That phone is at most 2 years old. It's not like the specs of that phone are in any way deficient; I guarantee you there is no app that you needed to run that couldn't run on that phone. Phones are resource intensive to manufacture - we should be aiming to keep them for 1/2 a dozen years or more. This mindset of replace with new and shiny "just because" [you're addicted to spending money] is bad for the planet.
I think it’s silly that they are using these chips and scratches as a reason to refuse replacing a faulty screen though.
If it's anything like my S21 Ultra, the paint is very strong and premium.
Apparently Samsung was using Nickel directly on the skin, and an acrylic alternative called acrylate that also has been known to cause irritation. 2 irritating substances, directly on the skin, in one pair of earbuds. Madness.
https://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-galaxy-buds-pro-ear-i...
Having the seller (instead of the manufacturer) deal with this issue explicitly under the two-year "Gewährleistungsrecht", where the first six months it is up to the seller to prove that you are responsible for the damage (since 2022 it's now 1 year, if bought in 2022), may yield a better result.
I can't imagine having the phone in the pocket together with a grain of sand would qualify as neglectful behavior? My phone has very tiny scratches probably because of sand in the pocket, but this is to be expected and not a problem to the phone, it can handle this without problems. So having phones in the pockets together with a grain of sand should be no issue. Is there such a warning in the manual?
Not only did they never revert/fix it, but they had the audacity to blame their customers for using "software that anyone could modify".
What? aging? It's from late 2019...That's hardly aging at all. I still use a 4a that is smooth as butter and battery lasts 2 days.
And the 4a was known to perform better than the 4 for some reason, so I’m not surprised that people are getting rid of their pixel 4’s.
Another good question to ask to assess the potential success of consumer products trends is "has Apple produced any of these yet?"
Every iPhone I’ve had has succumbed to either the home button failing (which requires a completely new main board to fix) or the lithium battery swelling to the point the case bursts open. My current model has no home button and has lasted the longest, and is a few months away from its third battery - I have no intention of replacing it until Apple brings back Touch ID or eliminates the notch.
My wife has had the same Samsung phone for almost fifteen years, but it fails consistently every year and she has it replaced under warranty (how many of those things did they make that there is a two decade supply of replacements?) She gets a fresh unit with a fresh battery every year and runs it until it fails, then she spends about four hours on the phone with clueless support techs from Samsung and Tmobile, they point fingers at each other for a while, then finally agree to replace the unit. Usually it is the screen that fails but once she lost a bunch of irreplaceable photos when the encryption key corrupted, leaving her with nothing but a memory card full of encrypted blobs. Otherwise she has become really good at migrating to new phones when they arrive.
I assume the whole reason Apple removed the button was because the economics of replacing the main board over a two cent button didn’t work out - even when the people bought warranties. (Applecare)
It was successful, I’ve not had a unit failed because I kept pressing on the same part of the screen all day for years. Knock on wood.
Also in your previous comment you stated it required a completely new main board to fix but that is false. It did require complete disassembly, but the button was replaceable.
What quanlity photo does a 15-year old phone take?
Why is "shininess" an attribute at all that people are willing to trade off for the hassle of dealing with mechanical failure? Probably because, at the time when they make their purchasing decision, they are too willing to take it on faith that a manufacturer makes sane choices around tradeoffs between looks and likeliness of mechanical failure.
Well: They don't. Stories like the above just show how easy it is for manufacturers to extricate themselves from liability. I had that experience some 15 years ago, when I was dealing with a phone that came down with a bad case of cracked-screen after two weeks of normal use. They just made a blanket statement that a cracked screen is always the customer's fault. And when I say they, I don't even mean a repair technician tasked with making those sorts of determinations all day long, but the process seemingly was just a pimply-faced kid in a retail outlet just saying that to any customer who came in with a cracked screen.
I never bought a Samsung product after that; But that TV still works :).
As for phones, i am still using iphone SE 1st gen. Simplicity, beauty, and absolutely perfect one handed operation on this phone has not been matched still. Which tells you everything you need to know about phone 'innovation'.
"What they’re doing currently is forcing their early-adopter customers to bear the risks of the new technology. With a device like this the policy should be leaning much more towards the customer’s side. A foldable warranty repair should be rejected only when it is extremely obvious that there was damage caused by the user."
I "upgraded" to a google pixel, with less ram, and a slower CPU. Felt WAY faster, more responsive, the home button was MUCH faster, and generally much nicer to use. No extra ads, no notifications of streaming NFL games, no partnerships with cell phone companies with value added services, etc.
The pixels by contrast are clean, simple, and don't show ads other than using various apps/browsers (by choice) that show ads. I pay for youtube red/premium/music, so no ads there. Netflix is also excellent at showing what you want, when you want, with no extra trailers, ads, etc.
Samsung wants me to try a factory reset as solution but I have too much of data to do that. Might move to pixel next.
It’s not just Samsung. Basically everyone has craptacular customer service. CS is like tech: extremely useful towards keeping people around, and the first thing to get gutted by corporate budget.
For anything not Apple, I can’t recommend third-party warranty enough. Shit breaks? Insurer pays up if OEM doesn’t play ball. Not your problem.
We got a home remodel, with Samsung appliances because they looked decent and were priced reasonably enough for what we wanted. Mainly, a Samsung Refrigerator, Microwave, Stove and Dishwasher. Around the same time we also bought a Galaxy Note9 smartphone.
2 years later, only the Refrigerator and Microwave have survived. The Dishwasher broke after a year, and was replaced with a new Samsung which also broke in a year, and we replaced it with Bosch. The Stove's burners just stopped working and couldn't be fixed by the repairman, so that was replaced (with a non-Samsung one).
As for the surviving appliances, Samsung had the ingenuity to build the Microwave's control electronics inside the microwave door, the thing most likely to get slammed, so we're babying the microwave or otherwise that would have almost certainly died from that idiotic decision. Even though the refrigerator is still standing, the "stainless steel" is apparently so thin it's covered in dents from when children left drawers open next to it, something stainless steel should be resistant to.
Lastly, the Note9 after a year became slower than a snail crawling up a rock (crashed constantly opening even basic apps like Outlook) and no battery replacement or factory reset could revive it. Also began dropping calls randomly and constantly, and apparently it was a botched firmware update that randomly affected people with absolutely no fix. Replaced with iPhone 13 Pro.
Never again.
I guess we should be lucky our stuff isn’t catching on fire like most Samsung products do (at least when they are not supposed to be).
As a company I can only conclude they have poor quality control or do not do rigorous long term testing.
I’d be angry if it were a €100 budget model, but this would make me livid.
The phone was a large glass-sandwich (AFAICT all their flagships still are), and within a week the glass on the side and a little on the back had cracked, just through being carried around in my pocket, in its official case the whole time.
I had a hell of time getting a refund out of Amazon ("We'll see what the manufacturer's warranty says" "no, this is your issue, you are the retailer and you'll give me a full refund because you sold me something that's clearly not fit for purpose")
Why are they selling things which are so expensive and so fragile?
I've gone over to the dark side now (iPhone 12 pro) for the first time, and while the software stack is not markedly superior on either side (IMHO), the hardware is far better designed and much more robust.
It's not just phones. I've had their TVs (old CRT and flat panels) fail within a year of purchase. A camera with a zoom lens that didn't work out of the box. A microwave which only displayed 99:99 on the display and wouldn't turn on. A washing machine where the hoses to the outflow pump came loose and flooded our kitchen. Luckily I didn't have to deal with Samsung directly and sent all that stuff back to the retailer to sort out, but I did learn a lesson.
As for their phones, they just seem to be a little bit more delicate than other brands. Things like the glass seemingly being easier to break, charging ports getting loose and not allowing for a good connection and physical buttons that just fail.
I know other peoples experiences will be different, but for me I have decided to never again buy Samsung.
The phone feels like how cancer would look like if it was made into a phone.
WTF is going on with tech/engineering sector? Everything seems to be getting worse. No common sense.
I've owned a few Android phones and Samsung seem to be the best build quality. Although I believe this went down after the A5, as they stopped releasing IP68/IP67 (dust and waterproof rating) rated midrange phones, until I believe the A33, which will be the next one.
I would never consider buying a flip phone with a single screen, as that just looks like asking for trouble to me.
My Samsung refrigerator has been the biggest disappointment I’ve ever had from a major appliance. It constantly freezes up. I had it repaired multiple times under warranty, and it just kept doing it.
My Samsung washing machine lasted several weeks past the warranty.
My early experiences with Samsung were so positive, my camera circa 2003 was great, as well as all the dumb-phones, and my first smart phone, a Galaxy S, but something changed. They’re not the quality they once were.
I find the Note's stylus terrific - and I find the iEcosystem does not fit me. Are there any non-Samsung devices with a stylus? Are there any good third-party stylii? I need something for dragging across the screen smoothly primarily, but also used for tapping.
I once bought an "active stylus" from ebay for about $20 that was terrific, but it failed within a year and I've been unable to repair it. It's not available anymore, but I've tried other active stylii and been disappointed. Also, that fact that the Note stylus is built into the phone means that it is always available - that is not the case with any other stylus.
Help me HN, you're my only hope.
Ten minutes on GrapheneOS.org web installer, no longer forced.
Currently they fail to fix their speech services for over a month. Doesn't update the language over mobile networks and drowns batteries while waiting/trying -- no matter the settings, restarts, Cache cleans. While other apps on those phones update properly over the same network. Dropped from a 4* rating to 1.5 (s. Play Store)
Major changes were "changed name", "new icon", which were a clear warning sign to me -- now they can add "botched network handling"
PS, I thought everyone knew the foldable devices weren't ready for primetime?
I swore off LG products about 15 years ago, after a similar experience with some of the monitors, but ended up with a LG fridge (which failed) and a TV, and various monitors full of LG parts. These big tech conglomerates are hard to get away from. Its part of the reason I cheer on any competition in some of these spaces, no matter where it comes from.
You could call out Samsung on this issue, but outright trumpet "never buy any device again" based on your edge case is just sour clickbait. Samsung - despite myriads of issues with bloatware, OSS-hostility, half-assed and then abandoned features - is still a major innovator, has a solid product line, and currently the only company that can globally compete with Apple.
For me it's the same as claiming that your eg. computer comes with 128gb of ram because you can buy some sticks and put them there
I mean, foldable screen, of course that will break quickly. It's actually astonishing that it survived for 3 months, that's pretty cool tech.
If you want safety, get an iPhone and Apple Care. They should be foldable in a few years time.
I was actually surprised someone would never buy Samsung again for their hardware as they are reasonably good quality and design. Their software on the other hand is pretty awful and the main reason I will look at other brands when this phone needs to be replaced.
Not to defend samsung, because foldable phones are a flimsy bad idea, but it's to be expected that bumps that wouldn't damage other phones (including phones that Samsung makes like the galaxy series) might damage the folders : the folders are made with a plastic screen, and on the recent models, a very thin, fragile layer of glass underneath the plastic. If you buy one, you really should have the expectation that it is going to fail at the slightest mishandling. You can even feel the fold when you touch the area, it doesn't take a major shock to cause damage there.
I bought a 49" monitor from them in January. A week later, I had two lines of dead pixels. I'm still trying to get them to repair it and customer service has been the worst. Moreover, the warranty online was incorrect. They said they would fix it but they haven't yet. It's been weeks. A nice $1k spent on a very frustrating experience.
I wish someone makes just TV panel with ton on inputs and outputs. I am happy to plug in Sonos soundbar and Apple TV to make it work and make it "smart".
As far as I know you won't see Twitch on any built in TV os other than android and amazon's version of android. That's hardly Samsungs fault.
Search for „digital signage display“, you might find something that fits your need. Have to leave consumer space and the pricing that comes with it though.
The short answer is that tizenOS is crap, and the samsung engineers I worked with to build smart TV applications were crap. The only way that anything gets built on that quagmire is the herculean effort of a lot of developers (NOTE: my info is 5.5 years old, so that may have changed)
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30423815&p=2#30428375
E.g. more or less bound to their camera app, my automatic sync with Google photos isn't working because they want me to use _their_ gallery. Only when I start Google's photo app does a sync start. Repeating explicitly: that's preventing that pictures are automatically backuped to the cloud! -- too me, that's preventing the main selling point of paying a lot of money for a phone with a decent camera And: why would I switch every service to the crappy Samsung equivalent?
Other family members with Samsung appliances like fridge, drier and washer have had similar issues.
Eg. Samsung's brand of Android has floating multi windows. Split-screen app pairings. There's also Samsung Dex.
Pixel and Nexus are probably the most basic Androids you can get.
I am mostly an early adopter (sometimes joking that I refuse to use software past the alpha stage)... But a foldable screen? I am deeply skeptical that this will be reliable anytime in the next two decades.
Since then, the only thing I will buy from Samsung are TV's
Among all of our partners samsung were easily the worst. LG had fantastic devs, I never worked with the android TV folks, but the OS was solid and easy to develop for. All the mediatek chipsets were all straightforward, just "here's the sdk" and go, it's only samsung that was a madenning morasses of kludgey code and arcane build systems.
(Several of those by other household / family members and/or friends, after I'd sworn off the company.)
On my "never again" list.
If you value your sanity don't allow vendors to bind closed vendor specified functions to the limited supply of physical buttons on the device.
Still the author does seem to have a point on repair policy. On screens specifically on this model they should have been more chill
Under the picture of clear damage to the phone.
Depending on what he means by "device", I don't think he's got a choice.
I really liked the detachable idea LG was putting out, but their out of the OEM race.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
That's some serious dedication to keep yourself feeling that unhappy, hateful feeling for a very long time.
I would kinda not want to deal with such an attitude as an employee or as a partner. You are not Steve Jobs man!
Though, not many companies know warranty. Only Amazon and sometimes Apple gets it right. Sometimes!