Given that the relative advantage of cryptocurrencies is strongest for a variety of financial crime, I think the distinction matters even more. As the Bitfinex thieves are learning, cryptocurrency transactions are not as final as they would like.
Given that the relative advantage of cryptocurrencies is strongest for a variety of financial crime, I think the distinction matters even more. As the Bitfinex thieves are learning, cryptocurrency transactions are not as final as they would like.
Tracking down said thief and taking the bag of money back in this metaphor constitutes a new transaction. As is subpoenaing Dropbox and gaining access to the poorly encrypted list of private keys from these Bitfinex rapper/hackers.
Of course, this is all a bit arbitrary. So I don't think we'd have much to disagree if cryptocurrency proponents were open about that. But what we get is a lot of them talking about 100% irreversible transactions. That may be true in the technical jargon of a particular system, but is definitely not always true in the broader social context or in casual uses of the term.