Right, but isn’t the main difference that children are still developing?
Shouldn’t we try very hard to avoid the possibility of screwing up a growing child’s body?
Shouldn’t we try very hard to avoid the possibility of screwing up a growing child’s body?
That's why we have the vaccine trials.
They're the very last step in testing a vaccine. And there really is no other option: if the end result is going to a vaccine given to small children at some point you're going to have to give it to some small children and see what happens. The only way around it is to not vaccinate children at all... which doesn't seem great from an ethical standpoint given the number of lives that have been saved by vaccines.
There are studies coming out showing heart inflammation in younger people caused by the vaccines.
We should weigh up all the info to make a properly informed decision. Trials are there for a reason after all.
See the graph here https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0/figures/2
The FDA skipping essential vaccine approval procedures in childhood vaccines, given fewer kids died of covid in 2020 than from the flu the year before, is one of the best signs that we are in a mass formation [2].
I understand that because there is only a liability shield for vaccines given to children pharma wants it for business reasons, but the FDA science advisory panel said risk vs reward does not scientifically justify childhood covid vaxx.
[1]https://www.wsj.com/articles/dangerous-push-to-give-boosters... [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLDpZ8daIVM
Yes, that's why we vaccinate. Those pesky diseases can screw up a growing child's body quite effectively.
How many children are you referring to?
The 100,000 doses of Cutter-manufactured Salk vaccine in 1955 with insufficiently inactivated, producing ~300 cases of paralytic polio, and causing the NIH & PHS to create and apply minimum manufacturing standards?
Then, consider that women are born with all the eggs they will ever have.
Now tell me it is a good idea to roll the dice and give that vax to a 5 year old girl and risk harming her reproductive future to avoid what will essentially be a cold to her if she contracts.