Nothing I said is false, any of you downvoters want to dispute what I said?
--- to others in the thread ---
> After obtaining a copy of the hard drive, DailyMail.com commissioned top cyber forensics experts Maryman & Associates to analyze its data and determine whether the laptop's contents were real.
Company name is listed. You'd have to go ask the cyber-firm they used, any outlet could verify it and write a story debunking it if they wanted. Something tells me they don't want to because they know it's true.
An email from the laptop has been DKIM validated, here's the repo: https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/hunter-dkim
What are you suggesting was made up?
You should seriously reanalyze how you reach conclusions and look up what cognitive dissonance is.