Hacker News Reader

Comment by throwaway4china | Hacker News Reader

I suggest you read up on the scandal more, you either leave out details willingly or you are severely ignorant of the facts.

When you say "for some reason" you are alluding that there is no answer and you're trying to downplay it, you are lying.

The laptop was turned in by Hunter because it was waterlogged. He signed the form. When he didn't come back in to get it and the owner noticed the illegal things on it, a copy of the hard drive was first given to the FBI, another was later given to Rudy because nothing was done by the FBI.

The emails and photos on the laptop have not been disputed. His business partner has confirmed the emails, and the DKIM of at least one of the emails have been verified.

View on HN

Ironically, DM did enough journalistic leg work that they managed to get their hands on a copy of Hunter Biden's hard drive and had "forensic expert" examine it. Something the rest of the "reputable" media couldn't do.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9445105/What-Hunter...

Based on the source how do we know they just didn't literally make it up?

> After obtaining a copy of the hard drive, DailyMail.com commissioned top cyber forensics experts Maryman & Associates to analyze its data and determine whether the laptop's contents were real.

Company name is listed. You'd have to go ask the cyber-firm they used, any outlet could verify it and write a story debunking it if they wanted. Something tells me they don't want to because they know it's true.

An email from the laptop has been DKIM validated, here's the repo: https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/hunter-dkim

What are you suggesting was made up?

That an individual stolen email could be released without ever having a laptop belonging to you. If they had jack shit they would have leaked everything.

Look how hard you're trying to ignore and twist facts to mold them to what you want to believe. It's literally astonishing to see.

Look up what cognitive dissonance is. You're experiencing a serious case of this here. I'd urge you to reanalyze how you reach conclusions moving forward, there's probably other areas of your life where you're doing the same thing.

Giuliani is an incredibly unreliable source, a known and prolific liar. Without the ability to interogate the evidence directly anything that comes from him is as reliable as he is.

That is literally how human communications networks work reliability of speaker is a pre filter for analysis of evidence. Do you specifically suggest that Giuliani is a reliable source?

If he's not anything whose exclusive providence is established through him is contaminated. Anything anymore including video is trivial to fake if you have resources and the laptop which whose very existence seems so unlikely turned up with maximal political convenience.

In brief we are supposed to believe Hunter filled a laptop with incriminating evidence, then dropped it off at a trumptards computer repair shop in a state he doesn't live in and forgot about. We are also to believe that he happily gave him the login to unlock the encrypted drive full of potentially election killing data that just happened to come into ghoulianis hands.

It's amazing that you believe this shit without hard evidence.

They did "leak" everything, from Hunter fucking prostitutes, high on crack, missing his teeth, and all his business emails,

Nothing I said is false, any of you downvoters want to dispute what I said?

No, because when you're so deep, you can't be saved. I'm sorry. I wish you all the best.

Projection. This is scary to you because you're not allowed to know it's true. Your President and his son are corrupt.

--- to others in the thread ---

> After obtaining a copy of the hard drive, DailyMail.com commissioned top cyber forensics experts Maryman & Associates to analyze its data and determine whether the laptop's contents were real.

An email from the laptop has been DKIM validated, here's the repo: https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/hunter-dkim

What are you suggesting was made up?

He literally presented all facts and hard evidence, but your brain somehow rejected all that, offered no response to anything he presented, and instead came up with this completely unintelligent response.

You should seriously reanalyze how you reach conclusions and look up what cognitive dissonance is.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com