[flagged]
True, which is why the politicians(including us consumers) all turn our blind eyes on those victims inside China, if everything can be CONTAINED and remains INSIDE, however they FAILED(purposely or not) with COVID
with this pandemic today everything has begin to change for better or worst
We still don’t know if it was in the United States earlier than this, because the American authorities refuse to investigate it.
And it was already present in Europe, in Italy and Spain, in November 2019. So it was detected in Europe, after the fact, before it was even known in China.
So, given this information, how is this China’s fault, when they themselves discovered and isolated the virus in December 2019?
Can you please use some mental gymnastics here to help us all understand how this is all China’s fault?
What if instead, the virus came in from elsewhere, but China got hit the hardest first, but their disease tracking system was the first to actually detect the virus? Because apparently, the rest of the western countries all failed to detect it.
And there are bats in Austin, Texas! You’re saying that the bats in Austin are clean, and disease free, while the bats in China, somehow only carry the virus?
And it was not whites vs X, it was Aryans vs "subhuman" "races". Jews and Slavs are as white as "pure" Germans were, yet were considered subhuman and for extermination. And anti-Semitism in general was wildly popular in many parts of the world, including Europe and the US.
Though the current US-EU sanctions on Xinjiang is quite an unexpected development. (Also might not really mean much.)
Pre-WW2, you've got millions exterminated in the Congo Free State. The Ottoman Empire killed a million Armenians, 500,000 Greeks, 400,000 Assyrians. The British starved five million Indians to death in 1900 and two million Bengalis in 1943 and nobody gave a single solitary shit.
Post WW2 it gets worse. Two million people in Cambodia, 700,000 people in Indonesia, 550,000 in Rwanda, 500,000 in Angola, millions in China during the Cultural Revolution, 225,000 in Bosnia, 300,000 in Uganda, a million Bangladeshis in 1971.
The list goes on and on and on and the fraction that prompted any kind of forceful international response is pathetically small.
Congo - when the atrocities came out, the king was forced to cede it to Belgium and the terror more or less stopped.
The Ottoman genocides were during the Great War, and even their allies ( Germany ) were concerned and issued proclamations, let alone their enemies ( Russia) which used it for recruitment.
Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia ended with wars/peacekeepers to topple the genocidal governments.
Most of the world knew very well the Jews were getting murdered en masse and forcefully resettled ( many of them tried to escape and were refused asylum including in the US, and brought their stories). Some resistance movements also brought detailed information.
In 1943, the Allies had all the grim details of Auschwitz with the Pilecki report, which was written by a man who voluntarily went undercover there and then escaped to tell the story.
I'm sure there would have been sanctions and the like.
But you're right that typically, it's considered no one else's business what countries do inside their borders.