This was an awful PR response.
I actually buy the reasoning behind it - but putting out a corporate speak like this instead of trying to emotionally relate to upset users? Smh
I actually buy the reasoning behind it - but putting out a corporate speak like this instead of trying to emotionally relate to upset users? Smh
Their reasoning makes no sense. If someone isn't buying on margin, who are they protecting exactly? Citadel and Melvin Capital, that's who. The funds weren't "protected", were they?