https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25878201
IOW, they're lying for Internet points.
People are adult, if a simple comment makes you YOLO your life savings on options you probably had a lot of issues to begin with.
Par for the course, really. Wait better because their main source of income might not be related to a gamble
Edit:
The money was made over a 100 trades
Option prices move every day.
There do exist, in fact, some people who are very skilled at making money trading options. Some people do it for a living with rich people's money, and many of them have the same skillset/education as the general HN audience.
If this guy actually made millions over the course of dozens of trades, it makes more sense to let him talk than to downvote him and tell him that he's just an aberration of probability lol. Like, what do you gain by that? If he's lying, humor him and enjoy the conversation. If he's telling the truth, pick his brain.
My view is that most people don't talk publicly about windfalls, so if someone's willing to do it on a throwaway it's way more useful IMO to tease information out of him than to marginalize his comments. That's also the best way to determine whether or not he's lying.
If he's consistently lucky, then he's good.
Probabilistic tails are narrow but they do exist. By that, I mean you shouldn't assume that something isn't worth discussing just because it is improbable. That approach stifles the free exchange of thoughts and ideas, and neglects the reality that some people are in fact talented at things that most people can't do.
PS I didn't say you specifically downvoted the guy, but we as a collective have downvoted several of his comments on this article, and you as an individual are trivializing his (claimed) experience as luck.
Personal note: I really don't know why you would bring attention to yourself over this