Do we actually need to guarantee universal Freedom of Speech to have a democracy?
Do we actually need to guarantee universal Freedom of Speech to have a democracy?
Free speech= democracy isn't a very nuanced view.
Just because it’s not absolute doesn’t mean it’s not true.
I think this is the US specific part :p.
The rest I all agree with
> Do we actually need [FoS]?
It probably depends on how much you trust the government to be "self-regulated" in prioritizing the liberty of the people over time. Democracy is not the natural state of things by any means.
In a real democracy, the majority could decide to lock you up simply because they didn't like you.
In a rights-driven system, everything is ultimately decided by the courts, which are run by elites.
Confusingly, Bill-of-Rights "Freedom is Speech" is really a right rather than a freedom. You can brazenly violate the live-and-let-live principle and still be safe.
Do we actually need to guarantee universal Freedom of Speech to have a democracy?
My view, no. If anything the Bill of Rights is the source of the rift that is pulling US democracy apart. Through the bill of rights, the judiciary became an unelected and unwieldy legislative body. US politics has been distilled into a vicious contest about who gets to make Supreme Court appointments. No other country has this dynamic.Whether Germany can be ranked as a democracy is debated: the extreme left and right believe it is a US protectorate, QAnon believes it is run by lizard people/Jews/Freemasons/5G chips... If you go by a freedom of press index, human development index, democracy index, it usually ranks below the Scandinavian countries but in a decent place.
The usual paradox of tolerance applies: if you don't censor some speech, you might be the one who will have zero free speech.