Hacker News Reader

Comment by chillwaves | Hacker News Reader

Have any democrats been implicated in voter fraud?

You are completely ignoring the high level of coordination that has been proven, between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

It's impossible to know what the effect was, but we know for sure they tried, which is illegal.

Can you find any example of a "voter irregularity" that has the same level of intent and coordination with an official of the Democratic party?

It only "goes both ways" when you are blatantly lying and discounting reality.

Many of the states in question are run by Republicans. Are you saying that Republicans conspired to steal the election from Trump?

View on HN

>You are completely ignoring the high level of coordination that has been proven, between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

No high level of co-ordination to steal the election was "proven". I don't know what kind of "news" you read.

https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-mill...

>It's impossible to know what the effect was, but we know for sure they tried, which is illegal.

If you don't know what the effect was, what is your point again?

>It only "goes both ways" when you are blatantly lying and discounting reality.

Childish name-calling? Nice..

>Many of the states in question are run by Republicans. Are you saying that Republicans conspired to steal the election from Trump?

Actually, I'm claiming both sides are in their own bubble clutching their little (R) and (D) flags and waving them frantically.

To claim something false is lying. To point out lying is not "name calling".

> No high level of co-ordination to steal the election was "proven". I don't know what kind of "news" you read.

Here, try this:

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/docu...

Ctrl+F "manafort" if you are having trouble finding it.

> Actually, I'm claiming both sides are in their own bubble clutching their little (R) and (D) flags and waving them frantically.

Bro, is this not name calling? At least I am actually offering evidence. All you is your sense of superiority.

Also, the whole cover of partisanship is just so intellectually lazy. You can literally dismiss any evidence or reality just by claiming partisanship.

I am sure partisanship is involved, but that is not a rebuttal to the evidence presented.

What a poor use of time to have a conversation with you.

So you keep posting the same old tired link claiming its "evidence". I don't think you understand what that document actually says.

I don't rebut evidence, I accept it, if courts accept it when used as evidence in a case. I don't know what rebutting evidence means, or what that would accomplish. After four years of nonsense investigations there were no indictments on this so called "collusion". This fact alone makes anyone involved in making those allegations look completely nutty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictment

No indictment = no charges = no case = no conviction = innocent until proven guilty. Regardless of this report, if Dems had solid evidence to bring criminal charges, I'd bet my life savings that they'd have brought cases by now, and we'd know about it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com