That's a bit like saying we know there is election fraud in 2020 because we found 2 voting irregularities. Minor voting irregularities happen in every election and are also facts.
Sorry, it goes both ways. Both sides need to provide evidence and prove it in court before making such statements. If you don't know, then the right thing to do is to say nothing unless it has been proven.
You are completely ignoring the high level of coordination that has been proven, between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
It's impossible to know what the effect was, but we know for sure they tried, which is illegal.
Can you find any example of a "voter irregularity" that has the same level of intent and coordination with an official of the Democratic party?
It only "goes both ways" when you are blatantly lying and discounting reality.
Many of the states in question are run by Republicans. Are you saying that Republicans conspired to steal the election from Trump?
No high level of co-ordination to steal the election was "proven". I don't know what kind of "news" you read.
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-mill...
>It's impossible to know what the effect was, but we know for sure they tried, which is illegal.
If you don't know what the effect was, what is your point again?
>It only "goes both ways" when you are blatantly lying and discounting reality.
Childish name-calling? Nice..
>Many of the states in question are run by Republicans. Are you saying that Republicans conspired to steal the election from Trump?
Actually, I'm claiming both sides are in their own bubble clutching their little (R) and (D) flags and waving them frantically.
> No high level of co-ordination to steal the election was "proven". I don't know what kind of "news" you read.
Here, try this:
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/docu...
Ctrl+F "manafort" if you are having trouble finding it.
> Actually, I'm claiming both sides are in their own bubble clutching their little (R) and (D) flags and waving them frantically.
Bro, is this not name calling? At least I am actually offering evidence. All you is your sense of superiority.
Also, the whole cover of partisanship is just so intellectually lazy. You can literally dismiss any evidence or reality just by claiming partisanship.
I am sure partisanship is involved, but that is not a rebuttal to the evidence presented.
What a poor use of time to have a conversation with you.
I don't rebut evidence, I accept it, if courts accept it when used as evidence in a case. I don't know what rebutting evidence means, or what that would accomplish. After four years of nonsense investigations there were no indictments on this so called "collusion". This fact alone makes anyone involved in making those allegations look completely nutty.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictment
No indictment = no charges = no case = no conviction = innocent until proven guilty. Regardless of this report, if Dems had solid evidence to bring criminal charges, I'd bet my life savings that they'd have brought cases by now, and we'd know about it.