> If all you wanted was a streaming platform that didn't have all these major artists on it, it could be provided for much less than £15.
This sounds like economies of scale but backwards, which makes me suspicious of this claim.
This sounds like economies of scale but backwards, which makes me suspicious of this claim.
A small act can't support itself from licensing fees alone either way, it would make sense to settle for less, or waive fees entirely, just to increase exposure.