2. The president did not use the symbol you linked.
3. Focusing on the antifa symbol used in the city of Utrecht, Netherlands is the definition of cherry picking.
The president's ad has more in common with the Nazi political symbol than a facebook group from Utrecht, Netherlands, and I'm sure you agree that they were not referencing the latter given it's not even in the U.S.
I thought a couple weeks ago we were arguing whether Antifa existed or was a splintered group, now they have an official logo?
The fact the logo exists and an Antifa group used an upside-down red triangle gives plausibility to the Trump campaign's reasoning.
Those two examples was just a few minutes of searching, I'm sure there are others.
Maybe we can ask the Antifa group WHY they decided to use that triangle.
I love how the goal post is moved to whether or not one existed to mind-reading WHY he might have been targeting people deliberately or why me might have used a niche Antifa logo.
edit ----
I'm sure Antifa groups attack the campaign on the same media platforms they share.
Maybe they saw it in a message or posted on a wall, who knows. The fact is you don't and I don't, why are we trying to mind-read why he might have done the worst case obscure scenario that someone suggested.
The more outlandish claim is that he was trying to demean the Jewish population with a symbol used during the holocaust.
You argue that his campaign couldn't have found this antifa logo, I argue that they weren't thinking about this holocaust symbol.
Where? They Googled "antifa" and picked the 493rd result?
That is outlandish. And it also appears to be a strawman that you just summoned because I don't see anybody on this thread making that claim.
The upside down red triangle wasn't used as a symbol for Jews in the camps, it was specifically used for socialists, communists, anarchists and other anti-fascists.