But then we can drill further and compare Lombardy, which has a similar population to NYC's. They have 35k and 22k cases, respectively.
I think the only thing we learned here is that snap-judgement narratives are fairly useless here. Just look at the raw data if you want to have an opinion, it's quite accessible.
NY — 1.03%
Lombardy — 13.9%
We know deaths lag behind infections by a week or two. [1] and we know the US was a couple of weeks behind Italy and Spain in their infections blowing up.
So we'll have to wait until a couple of weeks after peak infections before we can see the true mortality rate in any given region/country.
[1] https://miro.medium.com/max/9350/1*r-ddYhoUtP_se6x-NOEinA.pn...
https://twitter.com/COVID19Tracking/status/12432908485082603...
Hmm. Our curves look exactly like Spain and Italy, and indeed almost every exposed country appears to be on the same curve (with differing lags).
A few countries seem to be doing significantly better, but it's far from clear why.
China's credibility on mass death statistics is a bit shaky, and Japan has had a serious moral hazard given their 2020 Olympic hosting (and there has been a sudden blip in Tokyo in the last day or two).
Looking at the curves, though, it's hard to avoid the conclusion that that of the USA, however bad, is not obviously different than those of most countries currently undergoing the epidemic.
Perhaps some think the US should be significantly better than most countries. I'm not really a believer in exceptionalism myself.
What do you base this statement on?
That's to be expected, because deaths lag behind infections by a week or two. [1] and we know the US was a couple of weeks behind Italy and Spain in their infections blowing up.
We'll have to wait until a couple of weeks after peak infections before we can see the true mortality rate in any given region/country.
[1] https://miro.medium.com/max/9350/1*r-ddYhoUtP_se6x-NOEinA.pn...