Hacker News Reader

Comment by bdr | Hacker News Reader

Plugging a side project: if you want to be reading more poetry but don't know where to start, sign up at https://verse.press/ to get a weekly poetry "playlist" in your inbox. Sometimes it's a set of poems on single theme by different authors, sometimes it's a sampler of poems from a recently published book.

View on HN

FYI I ran into a csrf error -- maybe I was logged in to another django site?

Also, I would suggest setting DEBUG=False for production?

Very cool! I'd like to add that: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/ also has an email list for poem of the day. I may do both. :)

Does it only feature new works or does it take from the six centuries of great poetry we have in the English language.

The about page says

> My goal with the project is help people find great new poems.

To me, that sounds like it's focused on recent works.

That sounds hugely restricting the scope when so much of great poetry has been already written in the past.

It’s a newsletter dedicated to showcasing contemporary poets. Do you complain if there’s a radio show which plays new music because it’s excluding all of the good music which has already been made?

Yes, of course!

There's lots of good music made in the past, but I still read music review sites that review recently released music.

All poetry was written in the past.

This is a fair question but it's clear on the website it's mainly focused on contemporary stuff, partly because they consider it difficult to find.

That's not at all the case with classic poetry, I think.

Also, by definition, the canon is established - this initiative seems a good way of helping unestablished poetry into the spotlight.

Personally, I'd like to see a mix, with an emphasis on the contemporary; I think it would also draw a bigger audience, tho tbf I don't know what a modern poetry audience is looking for.

I would say that there is such vast amounts of poetry from the past, ( And there is enough there for readers to discover poems and poets they have not read before), contemporary poetry would be a small fraction of the entire whole.

Even some major poets like Wordsworth wrote such volumes of poetry, even seasoned readers can find something new and unread from his work.

I agree - but it is arguable that a significant majority of poetry by canonical poets is settled in acclaim. Obscurities by them generally (but not always), are obscure for a reason.

This will not at all be the case with new and contemporary poetry for the simple reason that these things take time to settle.

Classic poetry has had enough exposure; contemporary needs support and nurturing. Some of it will fall by the wayside, some of it will become the canon of the future.

Let's help it get there.

I should also mention that very many poets and remarkable works have due to matters of popular taste, etc has failed to secure a firm place in the cannon as it is now. So I think considering the cannon, older works and poets need continual relook and re-evaluation. Poets like Edward Young, Walter Scott, perhaps even Dryden, etc may fall into such a category. Even works of 20 century poets like Ezra Pound and Philip Larkin, aren't that popularly known to general readers.

I find the cannon limiting, for the reason that it does not cover enough of the past, it makes a narrow representative selection that misses out many unique and eccentric voices of their time.

Canon

Man I am incredibly curious what your bounds are for “great poetry”

Reply on news.ycombinator.com