Hacker News Reader

Very recently actually: https://www.npr.org/2018/06/19/621065383/what-we-know-family...

Pretty sure there's a big difference between being detained for an act and being detained for just existing.

We're talking about the existence of concentration camps, not the reasons for concentrating.

The act of having their nations destabilized by the US?

I reject your premise?

Immigrant detainment facilities are getting real close to the definition.

Not anywhere on the same scale though.

Did you know about these?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_Japanese_Ameri...

> has: present tense third-person singular of HAVE

Not only does this appear to be whataboutism, it doesn't even make sense. By modern standards the past activities of pretty much any nation are unacceptable.