Hacker News Reader

Comment by ryansmccoy | Hacker News Reader

I would def look into the track record of the new CEO, who started in JUL'18. Stock has under performed since his appointment.

View on HN

The prior CEO took on cheap debt though. This helped purchase massive stock buybacks (great for executives) which helped raise stock prices to satiate animal spirits. For some reason US business leaders (mostly under pressure from wall st.) aren’t the best at long term thinking anymore.

Great for executives and shareholders, many of which probably work at 3M. What else was management suppose to do with the cash they are generating? And, why was the debt cheap in the first place?

That decision benefits few at the cost of many (and eventually the few, just later). It is easy to imagine better uses of cash than full dedication to a buyback. Personally, I would make sure that R&D has plenty of funding, buy bonds, modernize old equipment, if necessary get consultants for leasing and insurance expenses,....basically hedge against risks and invest in competitiveness. Buybacks are fine to an extent. I think you know why the debt was cheap.

1. Corporations exist to benefit their shareholders over some term (short, long, whatever) as the shareholders ask for, through their elected board of directors. I tend to be sympathetic to what you're saying about taking the long view (esp. for a company like 3M) but the many vs. few doesn't make sense in a corporate context. It's the now vs. the later.

2. "Buy bonds"?? A corporate CFO would be pilloried for buying bonds. The shareholders are emphatically not interested in the CFO playing amateur bond-picker in order to generate a bunch of double-taxable income.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com