It would be better to have more explicit details. The post says we should get this guys fired. Then what does he do? Find another job. The post from DC doesn't say the executive's name. If new employers call DC to ask what happened, they won't tell them because they could be sued for slander. The trend has been to fire people who get into trouble like this. But should a company pass judgement on someone like that. How much evidence should it require to destroy a person's livelyhood.

If there is evidence DC should hand it over to the police, suspend the executive. Then fire them when the charges stick. Corporations shouldn't be dealing in justice.

If there is evidence I'm more than happy to boycott a co, but if we're asking the public to pass judgement, they should have the evidence.