https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Dig
https://www.mass.gov/info-details/the-big-dig-facts-and-figu...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Dig
https://www.mass.gov/info-details/the-big-dig-facts-and-figu...
"Phase 1, the creation of 109.4 miles (176.1 km) of drainage tunnels ranging from 9 to 33 feet (2.7 to 10.1 m) in diameter, up to 350 feet (110 m) underground, was adopted in 1972, commenced in 1975, and completed and operational by 2006."
Boston in general is a traffic nightmare, so I’m not sure how to measure success/failure.
It cost a ton more than any other way of delivering a similiar result. Operating costs are higher than a raised highway because it's underground. The only pro is that a bunch of rich progressives who don't actually live in Boston get to pat themselves on the back about how the old eyesore of a raised highway that "divides the city" (or some mumbo jumbo like that) is gone. That's not enough to be worth the price. It was a boondoggle. They should have just rebuilt the raised highway.