I buy when these silly articles come out.
It might all be bollocks - but why on earth would I rate your 8 word opinion higher?
More apropos here, concision can be a powerful dramatic device, but I don't feel that there's any wit in the post you're commenting on above.
If you want a clickbait/digest-in-an-instant headline, why not "IOTA is vulnerable to replay attacks but has no intention of fixing the flaw"? [0]
Personally, I like having a more detailed, precise, technical assessment. It may not be concise, but you can't put a pretty bow on cryptography without dumbing it down.
[0]: https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2018/02/21/iota-replay-attac...
Let me be clear that naysaying all the time is not productive, but neither is uncritically accepting that the system is flawless.