Okay, What was the last topic she was working on? Cartel? Russia? Mafia? etc?
Really, this is getting annoying. Just the other day someone came up with the absolutely brilliant theory that she must have been stealing submarine secrets for the Chinese or something to that effect and now this.
Did you notice that (1) he lied about having dropped her off, (2) he sank his sub on purpose claiming it was accidental and (3) he said she died in an accident and (4) he claimed he buried her at sea?
So far only (4) seems to be somewhat truthful, he forgot to mention he butchered her first.
The police have, rightly so, only given somewhat sparse information through the press. PM is currently, to my knowledge, allowed to read newspapers, and there is little reason to give a suspect a chance at information. It is highly likely they have way more information than what they are divulging.
The information they do give is to de-mystify a case which is already so crazy bonkers that even a good novelist couldn't have cooked it up. It is simply too implausible.
Everything points to murder. And I don't think there will be less stuff pointing to murder over the next couple of days or weeks.
That was not what I told at all. I am clearly saying maybe she was onto something and that could be the reason she is dead. (If the murder is related to her job)
It was one line.
> I am clearly saying maybe she was onto something and that could be the reason she is dead.
Yes, that is the bit that I object to. She is most likely dead because something Madsen did or tried to do to her before she got done in entirely, and it has nothing to do with the last story she worked on. So forget about bringing the Mafia, the Russians and Cartels into it.
You meant to write 'fraud'. Fraught is a synonym for 'to be full of' or 'distressed'.
It was me in fact. Please notice that you are wrong. I never said 'must have been', I said 'may have been' or 'could have been'. There is a planetary distance among both statements.
"The man loves with passion other thing; His work. Maybe she did something that was seen as a menace against the other love of his life, his submarine. Maybe she poke around and tried to sneak/photograph/open/discover some parts of the engine with the purpose to earn some bucks selling the submarine secrets when returning to China. I'm speculating of course, but unless he was drunk or drugged (unprobable while driving a sub), or both where flirting for months by e-mail and he feels cheated, there should be a solid reason for she being 'punished' with death. This is not a random act IMAO."[1]
> Please notice that you are wrong. I never said 'must have been', I said 'may have been' or 'could have been'.
You can hide behind weasel words all you want but the fact of the matter is that you were positing all kinds of ridiculous explanations for a situation where a simple one would suffice. That's about as clear an example of conspiracy nuttiness as I've seen since the Reiser trial referenced elsewhere in this thread.
What 'may have been' or 'could have been' still has to be remotely plausible to be considered and it really wasn't.
So if you feel that your use of the word 'maybe' gives you license to throw up all kinds of flak feel free, in the meantime realize that it does nothing to establish credibility and in fact probably achieves the opposite.
A proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, can be asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis)
Speculation:
The contemplation or consideration of some subject. Conjectural consideration of a matter; conjecture or surmise
I could see an escalating scenario where she, as a reporter would, started questioning around that topic. She hits the right buttons, and he loses it and injures her badly enough that he now has to make a decision.
Is a murder, pretty obviously, but the reason of the murder is unclosed still. All possibilities are open.