The Kno... revolutionizing digital textbooks with a 5.5 pound, original xbox size, dual screen tablet device that starts just under $1,000.
Shoot me in the face.
Shoot me in the face.
I look back at my Middle School years when I had to carry a bag full of books every day and... 5.5lb doesn't sound that heavy.
Also, this technology has been developed for students. If the device ends up being successful, I am more than sure that other tablets will appear with a broader target.
the other issue is pricing. this device has to significantly beat the price of used textbooks.
For instance, how about you mark stuff as important which not only lets you flip through just those bits later but it also puts that chunk of information in your automated "review-stuff" queue. Give that queue a "which things to pop-up when" scheduler based on measurements of your retrieval success rate fall-off over time and some memory science, i.e. it can be a textbook that reinforces the important bits just before your brain was about to forget them. You could even reward a regimen of shoving information through the student's attention... "rewrite these notes for extra points."
The size, sure it can be streamlined some, but this isn't for mostly passive content consumption and casual gaming so it should never be iPad sized.
Cro-Mag Rally is way more computationally intensive than anything I've worked with or seen. Perhaps more importantly, the more intricate scheduling systems don't perform any better than the simpler systems.
The real key to making any sort of repetitive study system work isn't really in the scheduling algorithm -- it's in making the system easy to use and always available.
If it's a lot of work to get information into or out of a spaced repetition system, then you won't use it. If you can't study whenever you've got a spare five minutes, then you won't use it. If you can't hit it from your desktop, iPad, Motorola Droid, iPhone, laptop, and computer in the library, then you won't use it. Because it's inconvenient.
So please, bring on the iPad learning systems. It's portable, lightweight, and can speak WiFi and 3G. Anything that makes studying more convenient is good.
The bit about iPad being too small comes from asking something like "why aren't textbooks the size of fictional paperbacks?" I suppose it could be just historical accident or the need for enough page mass that the book lays flat and open. But seems to me that the answer also includes something along the lines of different types of information being better shown at different sizes, with richer learning material needing more room. When the target users already carry a bag all the time, should portability of a textbook replacement be so overriding a concern that the area for showing and writing information is slashed by something like half (iPad screen to college notebook ratio) up front? Shouldn't form follow function a little more than that?
The really old college textbooks (1950's and earlier) I have are actually smaller than modern versions, with text areas comparable or smaller than an iPad screen. So perhaps the question can be reformulated as "why did textbooks get bigger over the past century?" Or maybe there is just a lot less reasoning behind their sizes than I'm presupposing.
Big textbooks, with lots of diagrams, pictures, and colors, look impressive. They give the impression of a tome filled with knowledge and wisdom, whether or not they actually are. Which is why school districts and professors in charge of lower-division courses buy the damn things -- they get impressive-looking textbooks to wow the students and parents, and they don't have to think much about the choice.
It's just good marketing.