Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
You don't have the latter.
What is more likely: That a bug or bird was captured on the video at a shorter distance than the rocket? Or that some UFO attacked the rocket?
Seriously.
What is more likely: That a bug or bird was captured on the video at a shorter distance than the rocket? Or that some UFO attacked the rocket?
Seriously.
I quote: The lack of a definitive root cause has prompted all sorts of wild theories, including a sniper from a competitor's facilities at Cape Canaveral.
But not the central theory which notes a flying object which is unidentified (written that way for those brainwashed by CIA disinformation that "UFO" means "Alien") passing the rocket the instant it explodes in the video.
Which even Elon said they can't rule out. But yeah. An inert gas exploding spontaneously is MUCH more likely than sabotage.... yeah right... That we don't need "extraodinary evidence"