Strange they don't mention the UFO in the video. Good guys stopping bad satellite seems to be a common theme in all the conspiracy theories.
What is more likely: That a bug or bird was captured on the video at a shorter distance than the rocket? Or that some UFO attacked the rocket?
Seriously.
I quote: The lack of a definitive root cause has prompted all sorts of wild theories, including a sniper from a competitor's facilities at Cape Canaveral.
But not the central theory which notes a flying object which is unidentified (written that way for those brainwashed by CIA disinformation that "UFO" means "Alien") passing the rocket the instant it explodes in the video.
Which even Elon said they can't rule out. But yeah. An inert gas exploding spontaneously is MUCH more likely than sabotage.... yeah right... That we don't need "extraodinary evidence"
What do you think about the recent news that South Korea is run by a psychic cult that groomed the president since youth? This is front page news. Are mainstream media outlets conspiracy theory idiots?
Before anyone goes apeshit, note that I make no assertions that ET (or even the apparent 'object' itself) has anything to do with anything. However, at approximately minute 1:22, if the video is set at 0.25 speed, a faint object can be seen approaching from the right-side mid-portion of the screen toward the rocket. As it passes, the malfunction occurs. Implicative of celestial lizard overlords and Armageddon? Most certainly not. But I still find it interesting. The situation of the Falcon rocket was less interesting regarding an 'object', which seemed insignificant. It's also fair to remember the "U" part of UFO, which merely implies unidentified.
And I gotta say, it still seems more likely than helium exploding. Since helium is an inert gas.
But lots of peeps on here fail the great filter part of Fermi's Theory, so you can expect the downvotes anyway.