Hacker News Reader

I totally agree with you, but how does the trademark licensing help with confusion in this case?

If they were to pay 1-2e/mo to use the trademark legally, wouldn't the confusion still exist? Or is the full story actually that they have to pay _and_ actually offer it as stock Ubuntu?

View on HN

AFAIK they must certify their images, which means they should offer a stock or a stock-like image approved by Canonical.

Unfortunately the only source we currently have is that tweet, which isn't the clearest one.

Ubuntu's IP policies are public, and you're right, modified versions must be approved by Canonical: http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com