With that said, it's ultimately the parent's responsibility to make sure the kid is eating healthy foods. I was recently at an amusement park cafeteria and I saw lines out the door of parents and their children holding huge green refillable cups, waiting for their turn at the Coke fountain drink machines. Many of the kids were clearly overweight. It struck me as terribly sad and unfair that the kids did not know any better than to enjoy sugary drinks, but that the parents knew exactly what they were feeding their children and just didn't care.
[1] http://www.cbsnews.com/news/kellogg-wont-market-sugary-cerea...
It's a social thing. The parents are clearly responsible for educating their kids, but as a society we shouldn't think it's OK to advertise and serve dangerous crap to kids and just assume that this doesn't affect behaviour (the very purpose of advertisement is that it affect people's behaviour, I always found it strange that we then blame them for being influenced). You have to start very early to educate kids senses to appreciate flavours more subtle than fat, salt and sugar.
When Jamie Oliver attempted to change the horrendous 'meals' served to kids in the UK, he hit this very issue: lots of kids preferred to eat their crisps and junk food rather than the balanced, healthy and tasty meals prepared for them by a top chef (meals that didn't cost more than the crap they were usually served).
Contrast that to the meals served in schools in France: they are balanced, varied, there is always some choice. You will always find a choice of starter, main course, cheese/yoghurt and dessert. These kids find it normal to eat their vegetables. Parents wouldn't have it otherwise.
In France at home, most people actually cook. Everyone orders pizza once in a while, but the vast majority of meals are actually cooked from fresh. It's not a money thing: you can get cheap produces. It's a cultural thing: cooking is fun, it's a skill people pass down the generations, it's time well spent, it's something to be proud of, it's a part of normal life.
And that's the problem with USA.
It's easy to say that it's the parents' fault that their children are overweight, but everyone else gets to deal with the fallout. With childhood obesity rates approaching 30 % in places, the extra burden on the medical system is staggering. Horace was very much to the point when he said it's your problem when the neighbour's apartment is on fire.
I saw an article while I was in California about a high school of last resort for juvenile delinquents. The reporter visiting it was shocked that the school was quiet, and the kids were well behaved. The reason (according to the principal) was largely diet.
The school had a cafeteria with organic food (some subsidization). About 1-2 months after a new kid entered the school, the behavor problems went away.
I can't find the link now, but I did find some related ones:
"Dietary management of juvenile delinquency", http://www.feingold.org/Research/PDFstudies/Feingold-delinq7...
"Nutritional influences on aggressive behavior", http://orthomolecular.org/library/articles/webach.shtml
The more general problem with America is the prevalence of business models that depend on sales of people's attention. "If it's free, you're the product" is such an integral part of living in the US these days that most people don't even realize how deeply in hock they are.
Cutting the cord, abandoning traditional TV programming (including daytime content-less shows and infomercials) and fighting the good fight against ads will eventually leave consumers free to make their own decisions. I'm worried only that it might take too long: the genetic damage to humanity will already be done.
citation? There's no way anyone under 18 just lacks the ability to distinguish between commercials and the program they're watching. Source: was once a kid
Perhaps the parent means the purpose for the programs and the commercials - as in that the commercials aren't just there to entertain you but to manipulate you in to wanting a particular product. Mind you essentially you can say the program is just there to soften you up and create a method to feed your brain the marketing message of the commercials ...
To me this just comes across as an excuse for bad parenting. There were junk food commercials on tv when I was a kid, but I didn't get to have them, because I didn't have money to buy them.
People in general don't really realise the impact that advertising has on them even if they are aware of them.