This article is excellent, both in the way it's written and in the underlying genius of using tenure as an indicator for credit for each paper.

One interesting point is that a women-only or woman-solo paper gets more credit (9%) than a mixed-gender paper (8%).

I'm wondering why they rounded single-digit number, it's 15% imprecision (8.4% and 8.5% aren't significantly different, whereas 7.5% and 9.4% would be a great gap).