1,384 karma · joined June 5, 2022
There are several links to 404 pages in credits section which makes me think this project is a total slop. Hope I'm wrong.
Thanks for letting us know that it's mainly the surveillance device. The advanced one.
Go and vibe-code your mobile OS. Lol.
They do! They just hate it.
Nice way to avoid the responsibility for any team fuckup: it's not me, I only teach them, they decide themselves.
AI is sold well because the user either corrects it or happily accepts any answer (usually, depending if one is an expert in the question's field).
Search is not the google's area, and it is not the search they sell! They sell ads.
Is it contradicting - does it mean the tariff is "over 100%"?
Not Terrence Tao post. Beware.
Or is it just a cheap PR (in a "hey, Aus govt friends, take some Share Options and let's do some PR together" style)?
It smells like shit.
They've lost me right there at the top of the article. This sounds like a pure hatred and ignorance to what the actual software engineering is.
> Google simply regrets android being open source.
No, they are benefitting from it! They gained some trust and removed competition from the horizon. Now they are locking the platform down to do what their business is about: displaying ads.What? Google is advertisement business. Not a software house. They sell ads. It all makes sense to build a walled garden. They are effectively a monopoly for half of the personal devices _in the world_. And they _will_ return their investments into the opensource. By locking Android and Chrome and showing ads to everyone.
Like the old days shitty TV, full of ads.
What an idealistic nonsense. Companies do anything not for people, but for money. We are not living in a socialist utopia (fortunately!).