zx8080

No. The oldschool is "daemon".

Is it a joke to consider openai as non-profit corporation?

XMPP. Run your own (federated) server, chat with anyone outside it, with e2e encryption.

Peasants have no rights and shall be slaves.

> Common Characteristics of Memory > - Zero access latency

It's incorrect, and simply wrong.

The Church of Chief Executives.

> into ghettos

No. Send to fight a war. To capture resources.

> you replace 6 warehouse workers making $80,000 a year with a fleet of robots and 1 technician earning $200,000 a year

Why not paying the technician $80,000 a year?

This is most probably where it's going in less than a year. The recent campaign "Safer with Google" in Chrome hints to this.

Intention of the AI?

This sends 2 clear signals:

- for developers: don't report, it's not worth it

- for users: Google does not care about security as it doesn't pay for reporting (enough).

> He didn't need his pen and so wrote more freely (at the apeed of thought).

Probably surprising for some, but it's possible (and pretty usual) to write at the speed of thought with a pen.

Don't live in the US.

The frog is boiling slowly.

Google is breaking fdroid in less than a month left for sideloading: https://f-droid.org/en/2025/09/29/google-developer-registrat...

That's pure marketing. Not off-guard. Profit-maxxing.

Harvard, nice.

Gatekeeping internet and reading every byte unencrypted. Nice business monopoly.

> No single company should have such unilateral control over the internet and its information.

Cloudflare with their "checking if the site connection is secure" (while being MITM) is another example.

It was a war tax. Not to just share it with people.

This could be a breaking change (for some corporate network environments).

Anyone seriously trust in the fairytale that the rich and powerful gives 95% of their profit back to customers?

It's not really what they've built their business empires for.

Do they have human CEO currently? Just curious.

> Why would Nvidia spend $13B for what seems to be a services that gives things away for free.

To stop that! Literally. To stop those services being free.

That's a great news for a few rich wallets and bad for all of us.

Is this post text claude-generated? Very creepy to read around the solution section. It reads like the agent report.

> Harvard has more founders

Rich parents/families are the actual founders, via their children. Harvard is because mostly rich can study there (and drop out at will).

It's all now about money extraction from the areas dependant on software, not the sofrware itself.

It depends on who they consider the customers. Shareholders and govt are the customers, not users.

Users is the product.

> but programming is never going back to normal.

Are you telling it's shit now? I'm just curious.

Now, that's why leaving some sites in background empties my phone battery.