446 karma · joined June 30, 2012
I'm assuming you meant to say 40 billion.
http://city-crime-statistics.findthedata.org/compare/4852-65...
There was a nearly identical article in The Atlantic a few months back, Edward Bernays would be proud!
http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2013/02/diy-weapons-of-th...
If you're interested in this concept, take a closer look at Wieman v. Updegraff (where the term "chilling effect" was first used), Socialist Workers Party v. Attorney General, a case very similar to Laird, and Meese v. Keene.
The following paper goes quite deep into the matter:
http://www.bc.edu/dam/files/schools/law/lawreviews/journals/...
Though a chronically absentminded student in nearly every other subject, I excelled under his system and completed homework every night, an accomplishment I can say with certainty I never once again achieved in high school. While the knowledge acquired from other courses has atrophied over the years, those classes are still as lucid as ever in my mind.
It may take an initial period for students to become acclimated to this environment, there may even be some push-back, but I think a very formal, cerebral learning climate is beneficial in many cases.
(4) Snowden has verified knowledge of an imminent death threat from the USG and is using Greenwald to convey awareness of his "dead man's switch" for his own protection. Employing Greenwald as a channel for this message, as opposed to himself, gives him some cover legally and won't further alienate Snowden from the public who might see him as blackmailing the United States if he were to outright state this in say, a new video interview.
This reminds me of Venkatesh Rao's idea of 'Hackstability'. Part of this concept describes how the antiquated and inefficient institutions of present could be maintained indefinitely through the continuous application of hacks and jury-rigging. This is proposed as an alternative to oft-entertained future trajectories like an apocalyptic cataclysm or technological singularity. Rao envisions our present system hobbling along for another century or so, growing incrementally more kludgey with each passing day, but persevering nonetheless.
Mr. Rao describes it far more lucidly than I, if you've never read his work you ought to check it out.
http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2012/04/18/hacking-the-non-disposa...
In an unrelated note, big fan of your site.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-approval-plummets-w...
It's difficult not to be immediately skeptical at this retirement considering the timing and circumstances surrounding the announcement. His kids are college-aged and this is quite an unusual time to resign. The fact that he is being replaced with White House lawyer Avril D. Haines (Obama's deputy council in charge of national security), seems to indicate that this is either in light of the Benghazi 'scandal' or that the Obama administration is purging intelligence officials who may not be entirely loyal in the wake of the NSA leaks. There is without a doubt far more to this story.
"With this tech in place, the government doesn't have to put you in jail. They can do something more sinister. They can just email you a sexy picture you took with a girlfriend. Or they can email you a note saying that they can prove your dad is cheating on his taxes. Or they can threaten to get your dad fired."
With increased surveillance, the government won't have to necessarily prosecute or penalize dissidents, they can merely intimidate them extralegally. It's unlikely in the near future that we will see intelligence gathered from PRISM used in domestic courts, but it's not improbable that this collected information could be used to blackmail individuals into compliance. Think J. Edgar Hoover's secret cache of incriminating files (on such dignitaries as JFK and Eleanor Roosevelt) extended to the general public.
One thing to watch out for is the CPU load on this, my Google Renderer process was pushing 100% when I ran the generator.
http://www.thebitcointrader.com/2013/04/the-mtgox-verificati...
The primary issue with these is that they have a user interface that increases the friction and time of throwing things away. Having to walk up and grab the handle (which is usually disgusting), throw in your garbage, and then close it, adds a small, though significant enough amount of time that most people can't be bothered to do it (many Philadelphians just throw garbage on the street). Additionally, it is difficult to throw away larger amounts of trash or loads that would require two hands to dispose of.
http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G...